IQLT vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and CSHI (NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Neos. IQLT is passively managed, while CSHI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQLT returned 14.25%/yr vs 5.42%/yr for CSHI. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQLT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

IQLT vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than CSHI's 2.31% return.

IQLT

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 11.22%
• 1Y: 18.29%
• 3Y*: 14.25%
• 5Y*: 7.32%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

CSHI

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.56%
• 1Y: 5.17%
• 3Y*: 5.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF	9.81%	25.42%	1.54%	18.73%	4.80%
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	2.31%	5.05%	5.66%	6.21%	1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and CSHI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2022	0.28

The correlation between IQLT and CSHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IQLT vs. CSHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQLT	CSHI
Financial Services	24.3%	11.8%
Industrials	17.3%	8.3%
Technology	11.6%	35.6%
Healthcare	9.8%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	10.1%
Basic Materials	7.2%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	4.9%
Energy	5.9%	3.5%
Communication Services	4.3%	11.2%
Utilities	3.8%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.9%

Return for Risk

IQLT vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT

IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 37
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IQLT	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	5.77	-4.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	10.45	-8.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	2.60	-1.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	24.49	-22.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.18	131.09	-124.90

IQLT vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 5.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and CSHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQLT	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.21%	-1.69%	-30.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-0.21%	-10.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.18%	-1.69%	-11.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-0.03%	-6.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	0.04%	+2.70%

Volatility

IQLT vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) at 0.33%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQLT	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	0.33%	+5.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.72%	0.60%	+12.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.00%	0.91%	+14.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	1.33%	+15.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	1.33%	+15.67%

IQLT vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQLT vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than CSHI's 5.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	5.31%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF	2.12%	2.33%	2.87%	2.27%	3.14%	2.24%	1.61%	2.28%	2.72%	2.36%	2.91%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQLT and CSHI in my portfolio?

IQLT and CSHI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQLT or CSHI?

IQLT has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to CSHI (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs CSHI's -1.69%.

Which ETF is better, IQLT or CSHI?

On 3-year performance, IQLT leads with 14.25% vs 5.42% for CSHI. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, CSHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQLT or CSHI?

Over the 3-year period, IQLT has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQLT or CSHI?

IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQLT or CSHI?

CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 2.12% for IQLT.

What is the main difference between IQLT and CSHI?

IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CSHI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.38% for CSHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.77 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.