PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQDY vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQDY vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (IQDY) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IQDY having a 17.95% return and ICOW slightly lower at 17.35%.


IQDY

1D
-0.89%
1M
6.55%
YTD
17.95%
6M
20.74%
1Y
41.61%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
11.61%

ICOW

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.47%
YTD
17.35%
6M
18.06%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDY vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQDY
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund
17.95%37.44%5.97%23.45%-15.78%12.00%9.54%27.27%-20.04%10.06%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
17.35%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%17.91%-16.09%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDY and ICOW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.85

The correlation between IQDY and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQDY vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQDY
ICOW

Financial Services

26.3%

-

Technology

18.2%
6.2%

Industrials

14.5%
28.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
11.6%

Basic Materials

7.8%
5.4%

Energy

7.6%
23.7%

Healthcare

5.4%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
8.5%

Communication Services

3.5%
8.9%

Utilities

3.4%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Financial Services

IQDY
26.3%
ICOW

-

Technology

IQDY
18.2%
ICOW
6.2%

Industrials

IQDY
14.5%
ICOW
28.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IQDY
8.8%
ICOW
11.6%

Basic Materials

IQDY
7.8%
ICOW
5.4%

Energy

IQDY
7.6%
ICOW
23.7%

Healthcare

IQDY
5.4%
ICOW
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IQDY
3.5%
ICOW
8.5%

Communication Services

IQDY
3.5%
ICOW
8.9%

Utilities

IQDY
3.4%
ICOW

-

Real Estate

IQDY
1.0%
ICOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQDY vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDY
IQDY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IQDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDY Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDY vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (IQDY) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQDYICOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

4.91

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.76

17.54

-1.77

IQDY vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDY Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDY and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQDYICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.87

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.61

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.55

-0.05

Drawdowns

IQDY vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDY drawdown since its inception was -39.60%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDY and ICOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQDYICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.60%

-43.49%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-8.02%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.76%

-14.81%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

-28.48%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.64%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-7.59%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.24%

+0.41%

Volatility

IQDY vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (IQDY) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 4.41%. This indicates that IQDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQDYICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

4.41%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

10.59%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.93%

13.73%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

16.64%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

18.47%

-0.04%

IQDY vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDY has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQDY vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

IQDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than ICOW's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.12%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%0.00%0.00%
IQDY
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund
2.76%3.26%6.95%6.45%5.52%3.89%2.62%3.85%5.97%3.57%3.77%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQDY and ICOW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDY has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDY dropped -39.60% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

On 5-year performance, IQDY leads with 11.45% vs 10.06% for ICOW. On fees, IQDY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ICOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQDY has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQDY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

IQDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.12% for ICOW.

IQDY tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IQDY and 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQDY and ICOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer