IQDF vs. KEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IQDF (FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - IQDF tracks the Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index while KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQDF returned 10.43%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQDF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.

Performance

IQDF vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDF achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.

IQDF

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 15.38%
• 6M: 18.18%
• 1Y: 35.90%
• 3Y*: 22.80%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 9.66%

KEMX

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 13.02%
• YTD: 42.26%
• 6M: 47.92%
• 1Y: 79.97%
• 3Y*: 29.66%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDF vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund	15.38%	35.42%	6.62%	20.10%	-14.69%	10.18%	3.54%	6.73%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	42.26%	38.28%	0.36%	20.57%	-19.35%	10.55%	12.84%	7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDF and KEMX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019	0.84

The correlation between IQDF and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQDF vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQDF	KEMX
Financial Services	25.9%	20.7%
Technology	15.6%	41.2%
Industrials	13.2%	8.6%
Basic Materials	8.3%	8.2%
Energy	7.2%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	5.4%
Healthcare	6.0%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	3.0%
Communication Services	4.9%	3.2%
Utilities	3.9%	2.0%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.2%

Return for Risk

IQDF vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDF

IQDF Risk / Return Rank: 74
IQDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IQDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IQDF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IQDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
IQDF Martin Ratio Rank: 73

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDF vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQDF	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	3.59	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	4.31	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.62	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	5.24	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.93	20.86	-6.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQDF vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDF and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQDF	KEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	3.59	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.75	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.68	-0.24

Drawdowns

IQDF vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDF drawdown since its inception was -39.83%, roughly equal to the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDF and KEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQDF	KEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.83%	-38.80%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.03%	-15.36%	+5.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.92%	-19.62%	+5.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.34%	-30.85%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-1.31%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.34%	-8.86%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	3.85%	-1.27%

Volatility

IQDF vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) is 5.63%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that IQDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQDF	KEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.63%	9.86%	-4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	19.90%	-7.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.44%	22.40%	-7.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.49%	18.21%	-2.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	20.94%	-4.31%

IQDF vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQDF vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

IQDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund	2.77%	3.27%	6.72%	6.06%	5.59%	4.13%	3.31%	4.46%	5.78%	3.89%	3.75%	4.27%
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.31%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQDF and KEMX in my portfolio?

IQDF and KEMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQDF or KEMX?

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to IQDF (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDF dropped -39.83% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

Which ETF is better, IQDF or KEMX?

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 10.43% for IQDF. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IQDF has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQDF or KEMX?

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQDF or KEMX?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQDF or KEMX?

IQDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.

What is the main difference between IQDF and KEMX?

IQDF tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IQDF and 0.25% for KEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.