IQDF vs. HYGV
IQDF (FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund) and HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IQDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index, while HYGV is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQDF returned 10.43%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for HYGV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQDF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for HYGV.
Performance
IQDF vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQDF achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than HYGV's 1.42% return.
IQDF
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 6M
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 35.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
HYGV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- —
IQDF vs. HYGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund | 15.38% | 35.42% | 6.62% | 20.10% | -14.69% | 10.18% | 3.54% | 20.96% | -11.71% |
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 1.42% | 7.92% | 8.02% | 12.11% | -12.60% | 5.93% | 8.01% | 15.76% | -4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQDF and HYGV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IQDF and HYGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQDF vs. HYGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQDF
HYGV
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
IQDF
HYGV
-
Technology
IQDF
HYGV
-
Industrials
IQDF
HYGV
-
Basic Materials
IQDF
HYGV
-
Energy
IQDF
HYGV
Consumer Cyclical
IQDF
HYGV
-
Healthcare
IQDF
HYGV
-
Consumer Defensive
IQDF
HYGV
-
Communication Services
IQDF
HYGV
-
Utilities
IQDF
HYGV
-
Real Estate
IQDF
HYGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQDF vs. HYGV — Risk / Return Rank
IQDF
HYGV
IQDF vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQDF | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.35 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 2.60 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 11.22 | +2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQDF | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 1.81 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.46 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.55 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
IQDF vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQDF drawdown since its inception was -39.83%, which is greater than HYGV's maximum drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDF and HYGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQDF | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.83% | -23.47% | -16.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.03% | -2.68% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.92% | -5.56% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.34% | -17.12% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.27% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -3.32% | -6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 0.62% | +1.96% |
Volatility
IQDF vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) at 1.17%. This indicates that IQDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQDF | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 1.17% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 3.02% | +9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 3.85% | +10.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 7.59% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 9.20% | +7.43% |
IQDF vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQDF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQDF vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison
IQDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than HYGV's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 7.41% | 7.48% | 8.20% | 8.77% | 7.64% | 6.07% | 6.18% | 7.95% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund | 2.77% | 3.27% | 6.72% | 6.06% | 5.59% | 4.13% | 3.31% | 4.46% | 5.78% | 3.89% | 3.75% | 4.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQDF and HYGV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQDF has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to HYGV (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDF dropped -39.83% vs HYGV's -23.47%.
On 5-year performance, IQDF leads with 10.43% vs 3.49% for HYGV. On fees, HYGV is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQDF has performed better with a 10.43% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYGV is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDF.
HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 2.77% for IQDF.
IQDF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HYGV is High Yield Bonds. IQDF tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index, while HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IQDF and 0.37% for HYGV.
IQDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQDF and HYGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer