PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGV vs. PFXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGV vs. PFXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGV achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than PFXF's 5.59% return.


HYGV

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.06%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*

PFXF

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
5.59%
6M
4.73%
1Y
15.75%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
5.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGV vs. PFXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
1.78%7.92%8.02%12.11%-12.60%5.93%8.01%15.76%-4.15%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
5.59%9.64%8.42%11.20%-18.83%11.61%7.61%20.52%-6.81%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGV and PFXF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.65

The correlation between HYGV and PFXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGV vs. PFXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGV
HYGV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGV vs. PFXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGVPFXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.71

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

9.05

+1.60

HYGV vs. PFXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the PFXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGV and PFXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGV vs. PFXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGV drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, smaller than the maximum PFXF drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGV and PFXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGVPFXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.47%

-35.49%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-5.83%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.56%

-11.90%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-21.80%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-3.64%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-3.90%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

1.74%

-1.12%

Volatility

HYGV vs. PFXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) is 1.04%, while VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that HYGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGVPFXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

3.70%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

7.35%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

9.43%

-5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.60%

11.00%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.17%

13.25%

-4.08%

HYGV vs. PFXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGV has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than PFXF's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGV vs. PFXF - Dividend Comparison

HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than PFXF's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
7.38%7.48%8.20%8.77%7.64%6.07%6.18%7.95%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.25%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGV and PFXF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFXF has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to HYGV (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGV dropped -23.47% vs PFXF's -35.49%.

On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 3.82% vs 3.42% for HYGV. On fees, HYGV is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 3.82% return vs 3.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYGV is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for PFXF.

HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 6.25% for PFXF.

HYGV is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PFXF is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HYGV and 0.41% for PFXF.

HYGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGV and PFXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer