PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQDF vs. FID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQDF vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQDF achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.


IQDF

1D
-1.02%
1M
5.16%
YTD
15.38%
6M
18.18%
1Y
35.90%
3Y*
22.80%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
9.66%

FID

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQDF vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
15.38%35.42%6.62%20.10%-14.69%10.18%3.54%20.96%-12.00%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.56%32.07%5.42%9.92%-9.69%12.90%-7.56%20.82%-8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IQDF and FID is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.78

The correlation between IQDF and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQDF vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQDF
FID

Financial Services

25.9%
20.8%

Technology

15.6%
4.1%

Industrials

13.2%
13.5%

Basic Materials

8.3%
4.3%

Energy

7.2%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
4.0%

Healthcare

6.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

4.9%
11.5%

Utilities

3.9%
17.4%

Real Estate

2.3%
9.4%

Financial Services

IQDF
25.9%
FID
20.8%

Technology

IQDF
15.6%
FID
4.1%

Industrials

IQDF
13.2%
FID
13.5%

Basic Materials

IQDF
8.3%
FID
4.3%

Energy

IQDF
7.2%
FID
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IQDF
6.9%
FID
4.0%

Healthcare

IQDF
6.0%
FID
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

IQDF
5.7%
FID
3.7%

Communication Services

IQDF
4.9%
FID
11.5%

Utilities

IQDF
3.9%
FID
17.4%

Real Estate

IQDF
2.3%
FID
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQDF vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQDF
IQDF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IQDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IQDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQDF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQDF vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQDFFIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.62

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

9.14

+4.78

IQDF vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FID Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQDF and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQDFFIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.30

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.46

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Drawdowns

IQDF vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQDF drawdown since its inception was -39.83%, roughly equal to the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQDF and FID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQDFFIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.83%

-39.79%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-8.93%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-10.97%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

-29.13%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.11%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-8.47%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.55%

+0.03%

Volatility

IQDF vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that IQDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQDFFIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

3.00%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

8.12%

+4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

10.16%

+4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

17.04%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

18.96%

-2.33%

IQDF vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQDF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQDF vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

IQDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.02%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQDF
FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund
2.77%3.27%6.72%6.06%5.59%4.13%3.31%4.46%5.78%3.89%3.75%4.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQDF and FID have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQDF has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQDF dropped -39.83% vs FID's -39.79%.

On 5-year performance, IQDF leads with 10.43% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, IQDF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQDF has performed better with a 10.43% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQDF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.77% for IQDF.

IQDF tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IQDF and 0.60% for FID.

IQDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQDF and FID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer