PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPGP vs. LASR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IPGP vs. LASR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPGP achieves a 70.34% return, which is significantly lower than LASR's 103.57% return.


IPGP

1D
5.90%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
70.34%
6M
49.90%
1Y
83.51%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
-9.51%
10Y*
3.34%

LASR

1D
8.19%
1M
7.58%
YTD
103.57%
6M
126.99%
1Y
389.80%
3Y*
74.67%
5Y*
22.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPGP vs. LASR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
70.34%-1.54%-33.00%14.65%-45.00%-23.08%54.42%27.92%-47.47%
LASR
nLIGHT, Inc.
103.57%257.58%-22.30%33.14%-57.66%-26.65%61.00%14.06%-34.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IPGP and LASR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2018

0.57

The correlation between IPGP and LASR shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IPGP:

$5.23B

LASR:

$4.58B

EPS

IPGP:

$0.68

LASR:

-$0.28

PS Ratio

IPGP:

5.00

LASR:

13.84

PB Ratio

IPGP:

2.47

LASR:

10.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

IPGP:

$1.04B

LASR:

$289.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IPGP:

$391.15M

LASR:

$90.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

IPGP:

$73.19M

LASR:

-$3.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPGP vs. LASR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPGP
IPGP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LASR
LASR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LASR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LASR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LASR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LASR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LASR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPGP vs. LASR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPGPLASRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

5.12

-3.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

4.15

-2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

16.36

-14.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.93

57.72

-51.80

IPGP vs. LASR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the LASR Sharpe Ratio of 5.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPGP and LASR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPGPLASRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

5.12

-3.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.34

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.21

-0.02

Drawdowns

IPGP vs. LASR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPGP drawdown since its inception was -81.13%, smaller than the maximum LASR drawdown of -85.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPGP and LASR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPGPLASRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.13%

-85.66%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.98%

-24.74%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.44%

-59.01%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.23%

-82.47%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.69%

-10.11%

-43.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.37%

-52.81%

+18.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.19%

7.01%

+7.18%

Volatility

IPGP vs. LASR - Volatility Comparison

IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) has a higher volatility of 35.38% compared to nLIGHT, Inc. (LASR) at 28.22%. This indicates that IPGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LASR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPGPLASRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.38%

28.22%

+7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.91%

59.02%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.75%

76.81%

-12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.82%

64.93%

-18.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.97%

66.24%

-21.27%

Dividends

IPGP vs. LASR - Dividend Comparison

Neither IPGP nor LASR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IPGP vs. LASR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IPG Photonics Corporation and nLIGHT, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
265.50M
80.18M
(IPGP) Total Revenue
(LASR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IPGP vs. LASR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IPG Photonics Corporation and nLIGHT, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
37.5%
33.1%
Portfolio components
IPGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IPG Photonics Corporation reported a gross profit of 99.50M and revenue of 265.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.5%.

LASR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.51M and revenue of 80.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.

IPGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IPG Photonics Corporation reported an operating income of -7.74M and revenue of 265.50M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

LASR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported an operating income of -719.00K and revenue of 80.18M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.9%.

IPGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IPG Photonics Corporation reported a net income of 1.58M and revenue of 265.50M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

LASR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nLIGHT, Inc. reported a net income of 645.00K and revenue of 80.18M, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IPGP and LASR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPGP has higher volatility (35.38%) compared to LASR (28.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPGP dropped -81.13% vs LASR's -85.66%.

LASR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.12 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPGP and LASR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer