PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPGP vs. KLAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IPGP vs. KLAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPGP achieves a 50.35% return, which is significantly lower than KLAC's 101.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IPGP has underperformed KLAC with an annualized return of 3.00%, while KLAC has yielded a comparatively higher 44.51% annualized return.


IPGP

1D
-8.77%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
50.35%
6M
44.48%
1Y
59.65%
3Y*
-6.90%
5Y*
-12.57%
10Y*
3.00%

KLAC

1D
-9.17%
1M
29.47%
YTD
101.73%
6M
93.20%
1Y
187.37%
3Y*
76.39%
5Y*
52.11%
10Y*
44.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPGP vs. KLAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
50.35%-1.54%-33.00%14.65%-45.00%-23.08%54.42%27.92%-47.09%116.93%
KLAC
KLA Corporation
101.73%94.48%9.36%56.05%-11.20%68.05%47.94%103.99%-12.49%36.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IPGP and KLAC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2006

0.51

The correlation between IPGP and KLAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IPGP:

$4.62B

KLAC:

$32.29B

EPS

IPGP:

$0.68

KLAC:

$35.29

PE Ratio

IPGP:

158.81

KLAC:

6.93

PEG Ratio

IPGP:

14.16

KLAC:

0.26

PS Ratio

IPGP:

4.41

KLAC:

2.47

PB Ratio

IPGP:

2.18

KLAC:

5.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

IPGP:

$1.04B

KLAC:

$13.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IPGP:

$391.15M

KLAC:

$8.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

IPGP:

$73.19M

KLAC:

$5.77B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPGP vs. KLAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPGP
IPGP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

KLAC
KLAC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KLAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLAC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KLAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPGP vs. KLAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IPGPKLACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.52

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

8.42

-6.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

26.61

-22.75

IPGP vs. KLAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPGP Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the KLAC Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPGP and KLAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IPGP vs. KLAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPGP drawdown since its inception was -81.13%, roughly equal to the maximum KLAC drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPGP and KLAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPGPKLACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.13%

-83.74%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.98%

-22.41%

-18.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.44%

-34.95%

-29.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.23%

-40.28%

-36.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.13%

-40.28%

-40.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.12%

-9.17%

-49.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.43%

-29.30%

-5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.48%

7.07%

+8.41%

Volatility

IPGP vs. KLAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is 21.60%, while KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a volatility of 26.21%. This indicates that IPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPGPKLACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.60%

26.21%

-4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.54%

44.11%

+17.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.32%

51.47%

+15.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.54%

44.38%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.34%

42.15%

+3.19%

Dividends

IPGP vs. KLAC - Dividend Comparison

IPGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.33%0.61%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%

Financials

IPGP vs. KLAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IPG Photonics Corporation and KLA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
265.50M
3.42B
(IPGP) Total Revenue
(KLAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IPGP vs. KLAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between IPG Photonics Corporation and KLA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
37.5%
61.1%
Portfolio components
IPGP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IPG Photonics Corporation reported a gross profit of 99.50M and revenue of 265.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.5%.

KLAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.

IPGP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IPG Photonics Corporation reported an operating income of -7.74M and revenue of 265.50M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

KLAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.2%.

IPGP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IPG Photonics Corporation reported a net income of 1.58M and revenue of 265.50M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

KLAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 35.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IPGP and KLAC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KLAC has higher volatility (26.21%) compared to IPGP (21.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPGP dropped -81.13% vs KLAC's -83.74%.

KLAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPGP and KLAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer