IPGP vs. POET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and POET Technologies Inc (POET).

Performance

IPGP vs. POET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IPGP vs. POET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPGP IPG Photonics Corporation	60.04%	-1.54%	-33.00%	14.65%	-45.00%	-23.08%	54.42%	27.92%	-47.09%	116.93%
POET POET Technologies Inc	-6.16%	6.39%	536.09%	-69.03%	-57.46%	9.79%	130.96%	38.41%	19.00%	-29.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IPGP : $4.88B POET : $533.56M
EPS IPGP : $0.73 POET : -$0.59
PS Ratio IPGP : 4.86 POET : 665.42
PB Ratio IPGP : 2.29 POET : 8.03
Total Revenue (TTM) IPGP : $1.00B POET : $762.70K
Gross Profit (TTM) IPGP : $381.46M POET : -$130.01K
EBITDA (TTM) IPGP : $95.78M POET : -$47.54M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPGP achieves a 60.04% return, which is significantly higher than POET's -6.16% return. Over the past 10 years, IPGP has outperformed POET with an annualized return of 1.79%, while POET has yielded a comparatively lower -1.86% annualized return.

IPGP

• 1D: 6.41%
• 1M: -12.91%
• YTD: 60.04%
• 6M: 44.70%
• 1Y: 81.49%
• 3Y*: -2.42%
• 5Y*: -12.05%
• 10Y*: 1.79%

POET

• 1D: 16.93%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: -6.16%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 57.14%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: -8.77%
• 10Y*: -1.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IPGP vs. POET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPGP

IPGP Risk / Return Rank: 82
IPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
IPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 84

POET

POET Risk / Return Rank: 65
POET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
POET Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
POET Omega Ratio Rank: 65
POET Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
POET Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPGP vs. POET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPGP	POET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.58	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	1.61	+0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.18	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	0.95	+1.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.29	1.99	+5.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPGP vs. POET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the POET Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPGP and POET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPGP	POET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	0.58	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	-0.09	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	-0.02	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	-0.00	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between IPGP and POET is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IPGP vs. POET - Dividend Comparison

Neither IPGP nor POET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IPGP vs. POET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPGP drawdown since its inception was -81.13%, smaller than the maximum POET drawdown of -93.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPGP and POET.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPGP	POET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.13%	-93.47%	+12.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.03%	-54.77%	+24.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.19%	-93.47%	+14.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.13%	-93.47%	+12.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.49%	-49.66%	-6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.18%	-61.30%	+27.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.41%	26.06%	-15.65%

Volatility

IPGP vs. POET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is 20.76%, while POET Technologies Inc (POET) has a volatility of 28.32%. This indicates that IPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPGP	POET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.76%	28.32%	-7.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.79%	78.55%	-29.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.82%	98.62%	-35.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.01%	97.32%	-52.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.99%	95.03%	-51.04%

Financials