PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPGP vs. POET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IPGP vs. POET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPGP achieves a 69.86% return, which is significantly lower than POET's 142.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IPGP has underperformed POET with an annualized return of 3.31%, while POET has yielded a comparatively higher 7.74% annualized return.


IPGP

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
69.86%
6M
47.24%
1Y
76.34%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
-10.27%
10Y*
3.31%

POET

1D
11.29%
1M
116.32%
YTD
142.97%
6M
155.91%
1Y
254.38%
3Y*
52.11%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
7.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPGP vs. POET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IPGP
IPG Photonics Corporation
69.86%-1.54%-33.00%14.65%-45.00%-23.08%54.42%27.92%-47.09%116.93%
POET
POET Technologies Inc
142.97%6.39%536.09%-69.03%-57.46%9.79%130.96%38.41%19.00%-29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IPGP and POET is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.17

The correlation between IPGP and POET shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

IPGP:

$0.68

POET:

-$1.11

PS Ratio

IPGP:

4.98

POET:

815.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

IPGP:

$1.04B

POET:

$1.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IPGP:

$391.15M

POET:

$182.16K

EBITDA (TTM)

IPGP:

$73.19M

POET:

-$59.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPGP vs. POET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPGP
IPGP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

POET
POET Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
POET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
POET Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
POET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
POET Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPGP vs. POET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPGPPOETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.55

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

8.80

-3.42

IPGP vs. POET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the POET Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPGP and POET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPGPPOETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.86

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.12

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.08

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.09

+0.09

Drawdowns

IPGP vs. POET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPGP drawdown since its inception was -81.13%, smaller than the maximum POET drawdown of -93.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPGP and POET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPGPPOETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.13%

-93.47%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.98%

-56.29%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.44%

-85.85%

+21.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.23%

-93.47%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.13%

-93.47%

+12.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.82%

-25.23%

-28.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-61.13%

+26.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.25%

29.07%

-14.82%

Volatility

IPGP vs. POET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is 35.37%, while POET Technologies Inc (POET) has a volatility of 63.79%. This indicates that IPGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPGPPOETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.37%

63.79%

-28.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.91%

121.30%

-62.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.75%

138.01%

-73.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.80%

106.77%

-59.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.96%

98.83%

-53.87%

Dividends

IPGP vs. POET - Dividend Comparison

Neither IPGP nor POET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

IPGP vs. POET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IPG Photonics Corporation and POET Technologies Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
265.50M
341.20K
(IPGP) Total Revenue
(POET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IPGP and POET have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POET has higher volatility (63.79%) compared to IPGP (35.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPGP dropped -81.13% vs POET's -93.47%.

POET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPGP and POET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer