PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPDP vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IPDP vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IPDP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQI

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.91%
YTD
13.43%
6M
12.92%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPDP vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


IPDP vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IPDP
QQQI

Industrials

45.1%
3.3%

Financial Services

18.6%
0.3%

Healthcare

13.6%
4.3%

Technology

13.1%
53.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
12.1%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.2%

Communication Services

-

15.7%

Energy

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.5%

Industrials

IPDP
45.1%
QQQI
3.3%

Financial Services

IPDP
18.6%
QQQI
0.3%

Healthcare

IPDP
13.6%
QQQI
4.3%

Technology

IPDP
13.1%
QQQI
53.3%

Consumer Defensive

IPDP
3.9%
QQQI
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IPDP
3.6%
QQQI
12.1%

Basic Materials

IPDP
1.5%
QQQI
1.2%

Communication Services

IPDP

-

QQQI
15.7%

Energy

IPDP

-

QQQI
0.7%

Real Estate

IPDP

-

QQQI
0.1%

Utilities

IPDP

-

QQQI
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IPDP vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPDP

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPDP vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IPDP vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPDPQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

Drawdowns

IPDP vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IPDPQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-20.00%

+20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.17%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.20%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

Volatility

IPDP vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IPDPQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

12.98%

-12.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

17.07%

-17.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

17.07%

-17.07%

IPDP vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IPDP vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.19%.


PositionTTM20252024
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.19%13.82%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.19%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

IPDP is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.68% for QQQI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IPDP and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer