IPDP vs. KCOP
IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) and KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. IPDP charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for KCOP.
Performance
IPDP vs. KCOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IPDP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCOP
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 14.96%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP vs. KCOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 4.75% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPDP vs. KCOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) and Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPDP | KCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.40 | — |
Drawdowns
IPDP vs. KCOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPDP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum KCOP drawdown of -21.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPDP and KCOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPDP | KCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -21.55% | +21.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.46% | +3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -8.60% | +8.60% |
Volatility
IPDP vs. KCOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPDP | KCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 42.13% | -42.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 42.13% | -42.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 42.13% | -42.13% |
IPDP vs. KCOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPDP has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than KCOP's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPDP vs. KCOP - Dividend Comparison
IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, KCOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KCOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Innovative Portfolios and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for IPDP and 0.99% for KCOP.
Find the right allocation for IPDP and KCOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer