KCOP vs. AMZP

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KCOP is a Copper fund actively managed by Kurv, while AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

KCOP vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KCOP

• 1D: 2.74%
• 1M: 9.19%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AMZP

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 9.19%
• 6M: 12.55%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 1Y: 22.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF	$286.13K	$288.55K	$406.50K
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF	$323.94K	$335.89K	$555.57K

KCOP vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF	4.55%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF	34.49%

Correlation

The correlation between KCOP and AMZP is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

KCOP vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KCOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 27
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 28
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KCOP vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KCOP	AMZP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.67	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.21	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.14	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.09	—

Drawdowns

KCOP vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum AMZP drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and AMZP.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCOP	AMZP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.55%	-27.36%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.37%	-4.92%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.58%	-6.45%	-3.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KCOP	AMZP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.51%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.38%	33.35%	+9.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.38%	28.49%	+13.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.38%	28.49%	+13.89%

KCOP vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KCOP and AMZP have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

KCOP vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, less than AMZP's 18.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon ETF	18.24%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF	6.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCOP and AMZP in my portfolio?

KCOP and AMZP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KCOP or AMZP?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KCOP or AMZP?

KCOP and AMZP have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KCOP or AMZP?

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 18.24%, compared with 6.12% for KCOP.

What is the main difference between KCOP and AMZP?

KCOP is categorized as Copper, while AMZP is Options Trading.