PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IPAY vs. TINY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IPAY vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IPAY vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
-17.75%-9.55%25.88%18.21%-32.38%-12.42%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
15.18%19.98%6.63%47.97%-34.14%8.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -17.75% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 15.18% return.


IPAY

1D
2.51%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
-17.75%
6M
-24.46%
1Y
-18.94%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
-8.65%
10Y*
6.12%

TINY

1D
5.10%
1M
-9.41%
YTD
15.18%
6M
20.81%
1Y
62.94%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IPAY vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IPAY vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAY
IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAY vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IPAYTINYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.69

1.78

-2.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.84

2.43

-3.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.31

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

3.62

-4.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.45

12.26

-13.72

IPAY vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAY and TINY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IPAYTINYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

1.78

-2.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.33

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and TINY is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IPAY vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than TINY's 0.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
IPAY
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF
0.96%0.79%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.25%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%

Drawdowns

IPAY vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than TINY's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and TINY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IPAYTINYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-43.79%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

-16.75%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.45%

-12.51%

-27.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-16.68%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.05%

4.94%

+8.11%

Volatility

IPAY vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 7.11%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 14.63%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IPAYTINYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

14.63%

-7.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.96%

24.91%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.48%

35.60%

-8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.81%

32.07%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.19%

32.07%

-6.88%