IPAY vs. TDV
IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IPAY tracks the Prime Mobile Payments Index while TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IPAY returned -8.70%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for TDV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.
Performance
IPAY vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than TDV's 23.09% return.
IPAY
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -16.03%
- 1Y
- -23.21%
- 3Y*
- 1.92%
- 5Y*
- -8.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
TDV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 23.09%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 36.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- —
IPAY vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -16.45% | -9.55% | 25.88% | 18.21% | -32.38% | -12.72% | 34.22% | 5.29% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 23.09% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAY and TDV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IPAY and TDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IPAY vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IPAY
TDV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IPAY
TDV
Financial Services
IPAY
TDV
Industrials
IPAY
TDV
Basic Materials
IPAY
-
TDV
-
Communication Services
IPAY
-
TDV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IPAY
-
TDV
-
Consumer Defensive
IPAY
-
TDV
-
Energy
IPAY
-
TDV
-
Healthcare
IPAY
-
TDV
-
Real Estate
IPAY
-
TDV
-
Utilities
IPAY
-
TDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAY vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
IPAY
TDV
IPAY vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPAY | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.36 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 3.79 | -4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 13.11 | -14.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPAY | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 2.10 | -3.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.69 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.76 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
IPAY vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAY | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -32.78% | -18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.31% | -9.55% | -21.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.74% | -22.51% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.49% | -25.11% | -26.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.51% | -0.42% | -39.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -5.36% | -11.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.32% | 2.76% | +13.56% |
Volatility
IPAY vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.07%. This indicates that IPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IPAY | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 5.07% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.19% | 12.72% | +5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.70% | 17.29% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.04% | 20.45% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 23.20% | +2.18% |
IPAY vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IPAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
IPAY vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than TDV's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.94% | 0.79% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 0.93% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IPAY and TDV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPAY has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to TDV (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAY dropped -51.75% vs TDV's -32.78%.
On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 13.94% vs -8.70% for IPAY. On fees, TDV is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 13.94% return vs -8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDV is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPAY.
IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.93% for TDV.
IPAY tracks Prime Mobile Payments Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IPAY and 0.66% for TDV.
TDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IPAY and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer