IPAY vs. MJUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) and MJUS (ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index, while MJUS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by ETFMG. IPAY is passively managed, while MJUS is actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

IPAY vs. MJUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IPAY

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -9.09%
• YTD: -16.45%
• 6M: -16.03%
• 1Y: -23.21%
• 3Y*: 1.92%
• 5Y*: -8.70%
• 10Y*: 5.98%

MJUS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAY vs. MJUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-16.45%	-9.55%	25.88%	18.21%	-32.38%	-11.63%
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	27.88%	-17.41%	-66.89%	-39.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAY and MJUS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021	0.33

The correlation between IPAY and MJUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPAY vs. MJUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPAY	MJUS
Technology	54.6%	3.6%
Financial Services	41.3%	4.7%
Industrials	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	14.1%
Real Estate	-	1.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IPAY vs. MJUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 2
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAY vs. MJUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPAY	MJUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPAY	MJUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAY	MJUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.51%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IPAY	MJUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.70%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.04%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.38%	—	—

IPAY vs. MJUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IPAY and MJUS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

IPAY vs. MJUS - Dividend Comparison

IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while MJUS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.94%	0.79%	0.77%
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAY and MJUS in my portfolio?

IPAY and MJUS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IPAY or MJUS?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAY or MJUS?

IPAY and MJUS have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAY or MJUS?

IPAY has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for MJUS.

What is the main difference between IPAY and MJUS?

IPAY is categorized as Technology Equities, while MJUS is Cannabis.