IPAY vs. MJ
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ).
IPAY and MJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IPAY is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Mobile Payments Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2015. MJ is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Alternative Harvest Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. Both IPAY and MJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IPAY vs. MJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IPAY vs. MJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | -18.32% | -9.55% | 25.88% | 18.21% | -32.38% | -12.72% | 34.22% | 41.80% | -2.86% |
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | -22.26% | 13.07% | -23.97% | -24.18% | -61.55% | -22.79% | -16.18% | -31.36% | -22.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAY achieves a -18.32% return, which is significantly higher than MJ's -22.26% return.
IPAY
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -6.81%
- YTD
- -18.32%
- 6M
- -25.05%
- 1Y
- -20.22%
- 3Y*
- 1.18%
- 5Y*
- -8.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.04%
MJ
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- -22.26%
- 6M
- -35.70%
- 1Y
- 20.31%
- 3Y*
- -15.04%
- 5Y*
- -37.64%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPAY vs. MJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IPAY and MJ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
IPAY vs. MJ — Risk / Return Rank
IPAY
MJ
IPAY vs. MJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) and ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPAY | MJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | 0.24 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | 1.16 | -2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.13 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 0.44 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 0.91 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPAY | MJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | 0.24 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | -0.64 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.51 | +0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAY and MJ is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IPAY vs. MJ - Dividend Comparison
IPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than MJ's 2.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF | 0.97% | 0.79% | 0.77% |
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | 2.55% | 1.98% | 13.80% |
Drawdowns
IPAY vs. MJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAY drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum MJ drawdown of -96.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAY and MJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAY | MJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.75% | -96.55% | +44.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.31% | -48.66% | +17.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.75% | -93.52% | +41.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.87% | -94.98% | +54.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.36% | -68.67% | +52.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.18% | 23.24% | -10.06% |
Volatility
IPAY vs. MJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) is 7.12%, while ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a volatility of 18.45%. This indicates that IPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IPAY | MJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 18.45% | -11.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 59.03% | -41.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 84.93% | -57.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 58.89% | -33.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 55.43% | -30.24% |