IPAC vs. WTM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM).
IPAC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014.
Performance
IPAC vs. WTM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IPAC vs. WTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 4.51% | 25.16% | 6.18% | 14.51% | -13.68% | 3.09% | 12.39% | 19.44% | -12.78% | 25.97% |
WTM White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. | 5.77% | 6.89% | 29.31% | 6.49% | 39.63% | 1.41% | -10.19% | 30.20% | 0.88% | 1.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IPAC achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than WTM's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAC has underperformed WTM with an annualized return of 8.70%, while WTM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.
IPAC
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -8.21%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
WTM
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 31.49%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IPAC vs. WTM — Risk / Return Rank
IPAC
WTM
IPAC vs. WTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPAC | WTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 0.57 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 1.02 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.13 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 1.09 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 2.70 | +6.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPAC | WTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 0.57 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.44 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAC and WTM is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IPAC vs. WTM - Dividend Comparison
IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than WTM's 0.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 4.14% | 4.32% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 2.76% | 4.03% | 1.68% | 3.37% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 2.66% | 2.60% |
WTM White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.14% |
Drawdowns
IPAC vs. WTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAC drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum WTM drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAC and WTM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAC | WTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -77.47% | +46.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -13.22% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -20.23% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.99% | -40.16% | +9.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.62% | -2.06% | -6.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -14.19% | +6.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 5.75% | -2.73% |
Volatility
IPAC vs. WTM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) at 6.58%. This indicates that IPAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IPAC | WTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.46% | 6.58% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 17.61% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 24.71% | -5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 23.46% | -6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 23.23% | -6.65% |