WTM vs. HLT

In the year-to-date period, WTM achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's -1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, WTM has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 10.83%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.74% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WTM Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTM and HLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than HLT's 0.25% yield.

The maximum WTM drawdown since its inception was -77.67%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTM and HLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.