WTM vs. HLT
Compare and contrast key facts about White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT).
Performance
WTM vs. HLT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WTM vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTM White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. | 4.88% | 6.89% | 29.31% | 6.49% | 39.63% | 1.41% | -10.19% | 30.20% | 0.88% | 1.93% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 7.36% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
Fundamentals
WTM:
$5.56B
HLT:
$72.13B
WTM:
$434.62
HLT:
$6.13
WTM:
5.01
HLT:
50.28
WTM:
0.06
HLT:
0.81
WTM:
2.05
HLT:
6.09
WTM:
$2.71B
HLT:
$12.04B
WTM:
$1.45B
HLT:
$3.87B
WTM:
$1.41B
HLT:
$2.28B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTM achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, WTM has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 10.54%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 46.67% annualized return.
WTM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 32.05%
- 1Y
- 14.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 14.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
HLT
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 7.36%
- 6M
- 20.19%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.19%
- 5Y*
- 20.75%
- 10Y*
- 46.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTM vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank
WTM
HLT
WTM vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTM | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 1.41 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 2.09 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.75 | -1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 7.94 | -5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTM | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.41 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.77 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.26 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.23 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between WTM and HLT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WTM vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison
WTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than HLT's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTM White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.14% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
Drawdowns
WTM vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTM drawdown since its inception was -77.47%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTM and HLT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTM | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.47% | -50.82% | -26.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -13.01% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.23% | -32.65% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.16% | -50.82% | +10.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -5.14% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.19% | -9.81% | -4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 4.50% | +0.49% |
Volatility
WTM vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) is 6.50%, while Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that WTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WTM | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 7.71% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.63% | 16.42% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.70% | 25.63% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 26.97% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 180.95% | -157.73% |
Financials
WTM vs. HLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities