WTM vs. SPY

In the year-to-date period, WTM achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, WTM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 10.68%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WTM Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTM and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SPY's 1.23% yield.

The maximum WTM drawdown since its inception was -77.67%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTM and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (WTM) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 6.26% and 6.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.