IPAC vs. FLAU
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU).
IPAC and FLAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IPAC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. FLAU is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both IPAC and FLAU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IPAC vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IPAC vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 4.51% | 25.16% | 6.18% | 14.51% | -13.68% | 3.09% | 12.39% | 19.44% | -12.78% | 2.76% |
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 4.69% | 15.95% | 1.81% | 12.58% | -5.58% | 9.90% | 11.00% | 23.38% | -10.17% | 1.89% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IPAC having a 4.51% return and FLAU slightly higher at 4.69%.
IPAC
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -8.21%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
FLAU
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IPAC vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IPAC and FLAU have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IPAC vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank
IPAC
FLAU
IPAC vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IPAC | FLAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.13 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 1.60 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 1.76 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 6.97 | +2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IPAC | FLAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.13 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.34 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.31 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between IPAC and FLAU is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IPAC vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison
IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than FLAU's 3.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 4.14% | 4.32% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 2.76% | 4.03% | 1.68% | 3.37% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 2.66% | 2.60% |
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 3.11% | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.62% | 5.91% | 5.14% | 2.18% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IPAC vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IPAC drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAC and FLAU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IPAC | FLAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.99% | -45.73% | +14.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -12.82% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.64% | -24.68% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.62% | -8.18% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -6.87% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.25% | -0.23% |
Volatility
IPAC vs. FLAU - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) at 7.98%. This indicates that IPAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IPAC | FLAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.46% | 7.98% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 12.46% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 20.57% | -1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 19.51% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 23.66% | -7.08% |