IPAC vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IPAC (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IPAC is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IPAC returned 9.13%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DGRO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IPAC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

IPAC vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IPAC achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IPAC has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 9.13%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.

IPAC

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 6M: 15.39%
• 1Y: 28.03%
• 3Y*: 17.03%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: 9.13%

DGRO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IPAC vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	13.73%	25.16%	6.18%	14.51%	-13.68%	3.09%	12.39%	19.44%	-12.78%	25.97%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	8.76%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IPAC and DGRO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014	0.70

The correlation between IPAC and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IPAC vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IPAC	DGRO
Financial Services	22.9%	21.2%
Industrials	21.3%	10.8%
Technology	12.9%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	5.7%
Basic Materials	8.2%	2.5%
Communication Services	5.7%	0.1%
Real Estate	5.5%	-
Healthcare	5.3%	16.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	11.5%
Utilities	1.9%	6.9%
Energy	1.8%	5.6%

Return for Risk

IPAC vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IPAC

IPAC Risk / Return Rank: 50
IPAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
IPAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
IPAC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
IPAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IPAC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 71
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IPAC vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IPAC	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.39	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	3.49	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	3.50	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.83	13.52	-4.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IPAC vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IPAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IPAC and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IPAC	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	2.39	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.77	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.80	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.76	-0.32

Drawdowns

IPAC vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IPAC drawdown since its inception was -30.99%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IPAC and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IPAC	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.99%	-35.10%	+4.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.49%	-6.47%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.45%	-14.03%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.64%	-19.31%	-10.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.99%	-35.10%	+4.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.28%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.48%	-3.44%	-4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	1.67%	+1.51%

Volatility

IPAC vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that IPAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IPAC	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	2.21%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	6.91%	+6.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.41%	9.48%	+6.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.62%	13.82%	+2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.58%	16.62%	-0.04%

IPAC vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IPAC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IPAC vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.96%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF	3.80%	4.32%	3.43%	3.16%	2.76%	4.03%	1.68%	3.37%	2.95%	2.98%	2.66%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IPAC and DGRO in my portfolio?

IPAC and DGRO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IPAC or DGRO?

IPAC has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IPAC dropped -30.99% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which ETF is better, IPAC or DGRO?

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 9.13% for IPAC. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IPAC or DGRO?

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IPAC or DGRO?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IPAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IPAC or DGRO?

IPAC has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

What is the main difference between IPAC and DGRO?

IPAC is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IPAC tracks MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IPAC and 0.08% for DGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.