IOYY vs. QRMI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF) and QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QRMI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QRMI.

Performance

IOYY vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF (IOYY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOYY achieves a -11.06% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's 2.60% return.

IOYY

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 9.06%
• YTD: -11.06%
• 6M: -19.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 9.73%
• 3Y*: 7.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOYY vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF	-11.06%	-11.64%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.60%	1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IOYY and QRMI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.25

Return for Risk

IOYY vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOYY vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF (IOYY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IOYY	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.00	0.22	-1.23

Drawdowns

IOYY vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOYY drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOYY and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOYY	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.47%	-20.95%	-17.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.04%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.87%	0.00%	-27.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.09%	-7.98%	-15.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IOYY	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.42%	5.76%	+28.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.42%	8.34%	+26.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.42%	8.34%	+26.08%

IOYY vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOYY vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

IOYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.09%, more than QRMI's 12.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IOYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF	121.09%	28.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.19%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IOYY and QRMI in my portfolio?

IOYY and QRMI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IOYY or QRMI?

On fees, QRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IOYY or QRMI?

QRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for IOYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IOYY or QRMI?

IOYY has the higher dividend yield at 121.09%, compared with 12.19% for QRMI.

What is the main difference between IOYY and QRMI?

IOYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QRMI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for IOYY and 0.60% for QRMI.