PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOSIX vs. IRLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOSIX vs. IRLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Global Bond Portfolio (IOSIX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOSIX achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than IRLNX's 9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IOSIX has underperformed IRLNX with an annualized return of 0.76%, while IRLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.35% annualized return.


IOSIX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.27%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
-2.25%
10Y*
0.76%

IRLNX

1D
-0.44%
1M
8.00%
YTD
9.30%
6M
8.71%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
26.12%
5Y*
17.02%
10Y*
19.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOSIX vs. IRLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOSIX
Voya Global Bond Portfolio
0.04%8.09%-1.31%5.85%-18.95%-5.21%9.21%7.92%-1.99%9.68%
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
9.30%18.20%34.60%46.01%-30.06%30.63%38.32%35.61%-2.02%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IOSIX and IRLNX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2009

0.17

The correlation between IOSIX and IRLNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOSIX vs. IRLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOSIX
IOSIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IOSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IOSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

IRLNX
IRLNX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IRLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IRLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOSIX vs. IRLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Global Bond Portfolio (IOSIX) and Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOSIXIRLNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.36

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

2.02

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

6.36

-4.95

IOSIX vs. IRLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the IRLNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOSIX and IRLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOSIXIRLNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

2.08

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

0.80

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.92

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.93

-0.82

Drawdowns

IOSIX vs. IRLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOSIX drawdown since its inception was -28.75%, smaller than the maximum IRLNX drawdown of -32.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOSIX and IRLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOSIXIRLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.75%

-32.90%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-16.64%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.86%

-23.31%

+15.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-32.90%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.75%

-32.90%

+4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.51%

-0.44%

-13.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.33%

-4.74%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

5.02%

-3.38%

Volatility

IOSIX vs. IRLNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Global Bond Portfolio (IOSIX) is 2.13%, while Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRLNX) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that IOSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOSIXIRLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

5.14%

-3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

12.26%

-7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

16.23%

-10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

22.00%

-15.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.86%

21.45%

-15.59%

IOSIX vs. IRLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOSIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than IRLNX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOSIX vs. IRLNX - Dividend Comparison

IOSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than IRLNX's 18.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOSIX
Voya Global Bond Portfolio
3.54%3.19%4.04%3.28%2.30%5.60%2.73%4.64%3.90%2.50%1.75%0.00%
IRLNX
Voya Russell Large Cap Growth Index Portfolio
18.89%9.54%3.55%4.60%11.22%0.83%4.18%4.95%3.70%0.99%1.23%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IOSIX and IRLNX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRLNX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to IOSIX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOSIX dropped -28.75% vs IRLNX's -32.90%.

IRLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOSIX and IRLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer