IOPP vs. KBA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IOPP (Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IOPP is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while KBA is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Index. IOPP is actively managed, while KBA is passively managed. Over the past year, IOPP returned -0.70% vs 51.44% for KBA. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IOPP charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.

Performance

IOPP vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF (IOPP) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOPP achieves a -3.61% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 14.56% return.

IOPP

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: -3.61%
• 6M: -3.29%
• 1Y: -0.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KBA

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: 6.66%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 51.44%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 7.65%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOPP vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IOPP Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF	-3.61%	1.86%	14.31%
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	14.56%	33.88%	14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IOPP and KBA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2024	0.16

The correlation between IOPP and KBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IOPP vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IOPP	KBA
Consumer Cyclical	41.2%	5.4%
Financial Services	15.3%	17.4%
Consumer Defensive	12.8%	6.5%
Industrials	10.3%	15.4%
Healthcare	9.7%	3.7%
Communication Services	7.7%	1.4%
Basic Materials	3.0%	9.3%
Technology	0.0%	34.1%
Energy	-	3.0%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

IOPP vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOPP

IOPP Risk / Return Rank: 8
IOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
IOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
IOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8
IOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
IOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 8

KBA

KBA Risk / Return Rank: 88
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 84
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOPP vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF (IOPP) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IOPP	KBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	2.78	-2.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	3.70	-3.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.49	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	6.75	-6.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	17.19	-17.29

IOPP vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOPP Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the KBA Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOPP and KBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IOPP vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOPP drawdown since its inception was -23.67%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOPP and KBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOPP	KBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.67%	-53.24%	+29.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.42%	-7.65%	-11.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.96%	0.00%	-11.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.96%	-25.72%	+16.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.57%	3.00%	+4.57%

Volatility

IOPP vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF (IOPP) is 4.92%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that IOPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IOPP	KBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	8.04%	-3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.63%	13.67%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.38%	18.65%	-1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	27.30%	-10.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.81%	25.37%	-8.56%

IOPP vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOPP has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOPP vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

IOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than KBA's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IOPP Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF	0.19%	0.29%	6.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	1.36%	1.56%	2.18%	2.34%	49.05%	9.07%	0.65%	1.53%	3.77%	1.46%	6.62%	29.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IOPP and KBA in my portfolio?

IOPP and KBA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IOPP or KBA?

KBA has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to IOPP (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOPP dropped -23.67% vs KBA's -53.24%.

Which ETF is better, IOPP or KBA?

On 1-year performance, KBA leads with 51.44% vs -0.70% for IOPP. On fees, KBA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IOPP has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IOPP or KBA?

Over the 1-year period, KBA has performed better with a 51.44% return vs -0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IOPP or KBA?

KBA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for IOPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IOPP or KBA?

KBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.19% for IOPP.

What is the main difference between IOPP and KBA?

IOPP is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while KBA is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for IOPP and 0.60% for KBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.