PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IOPP vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IOPP vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF (IOPP) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOPP achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.99% return.


IOPP

1D
1.90%
1M
0.66%
YTD
-7.36%
6M
-5.51%
1Y
-4.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.09%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.99%
6M
1.92%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOPP vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IOPP
Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF
-7.36%1.86%14.13%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.99%4.13%4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IOPP and BUCK is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024

0.05

IOPP vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IOPP
BUCK

Consumer Cyclical

39.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

17.1%

-

Financial Services

15.0%
100.0%

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Industrials

8.9%

-

Communication Services

7.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Technology

0.0%

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IOPP
39.4%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

IOPP
17.1%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

IOPP
15.0%
BUCK
100.0%

Healthcare

IOPP
9.0%
BUCK

-

Industrials

IOPP
8.9%
BUCK

-

Communication Services

IOPP
7.6%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

IOPP
3.0%
BUCK

-

Technology

IOPP
0.0%
BUCK

-

Energy

IOPP

-

BUCK

-

Real Estate

IOPP

-

BUCK

-

Utilities

IOPP

-

BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IOPP vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOPP
IOPP Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOPP vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF (IOPP) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IOPPBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.51

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

5.73

-5.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

30.33

-31.00

IOPP vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOPP Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOPP and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IOPPBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

2.42

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

1.48

-1.28

Drawdowns

IOPP vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOPP drawdown since its inception was -23.67%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOPP and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IOPPBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.67%

-5.43%

-18.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.42%

-1.31%

-18.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.38%

0.00%

-15.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-0.49%

-8.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.27%

0.25%

+7.02%

Volatility

IOPP vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF (IOPP) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that IOPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IOPPBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

0.70%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

1.52%

+12.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

3.14%

+14.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

3.48%

+13.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

3.48%

+13.33%

IOPP vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOPP has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IOPP vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

IOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than BUCK's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.41%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
IOPP
Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF
0.20%0.29%6.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IOPP and BUCK have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IOPP has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOPP dropped -23.67% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.46% vs -4.86% for IOPP. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.46% return vs -4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for IOPP.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.20% for IOPP.

IOPP is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BUCK is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for IOPP and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IOPP and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer