IOO vs. HERD
IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IOO tracks the S&P Global 100 Index (Net) while HERD tracks the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IOO returned 16.68%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for HERD. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
IOO vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IOO having a 12.26% return and HERD slightly lower at 12.05%.
IOO
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IOO vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 12.26% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 13.97% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 12.05% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOO and HERD is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.57 |
The correlation between IOO and HERD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
IOO vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IOO
HERD
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IOO
HERD
Communication Services
IOO
HERD
Financial Services
IOO
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
IOO
HERD
Healthcare
IOO
HERD
Consumer Defensive
IOO
HERD
Industrials
IOO
HERD
Energy
IOO
HERD
Basic Materials
IOO
HERD
Utilities
IOO
HERD
Real Estate
IOO
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOO vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
IOO
HERD
IOO vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IOO | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 5.19 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.94 | 17.73 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOO | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 2.54 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.56 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.63 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
IOO vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOO | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.85% | -39.41% | -16.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -5.68% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -18.90% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.52% | -21.60% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.67% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -4.55% | -6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.66% | +0.48% |
Volatility
IOO vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) at 2.92%. This indicates that IOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOO | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 2.92% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 7.74% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 11.62% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 17.76% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 20.50% | -2.72% |
IOO vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOO vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than HERD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOO and HERD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IOO has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs HERD's -39.41%.
On 5-year performance, IOO leads with 16.68% vs 9.95% for HERD. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.
IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.73% for HERD.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IOO and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer