IOO vs. HAIL
IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) and HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IOO tracks the S&P Global 100 Index (Net) while HAIL tracks the S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IOO returned 16.68%/yr vs -5.36%/yr for HAIL. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IOO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HAIL.
Performance
IOO vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than HAIL's 31.10% return.
IOO
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.70%
HAIL
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- 16.87%
- YTD
- 31.10%
- 6M
- 29.05%
- 1Y
- 58.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- -5.36%
- 10Y*
- —
IOO vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 12.26% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 0.02% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 31.10% | 19.62% | -6.98% | 9.65% | -45.72% | 1.95% | 84.33% | 30.63% | -19.96% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IOO and HAIL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IOO and HAIL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
IOO vs. HAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IOO
HAIL
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IOO
HAIL
Communication Services
IOO
HAIL
Financial Services
IOO
HAIL
Consumer Cyclical
IOO
HAIL
Healthcare
IOO
HAIL
-
Consumer Defensive
IOO
HAIL
-
Industrials
IOO
HAIL
Energy
IOO
HAIL
Basic Materials
IOO
HAIL
Utilities
IOO
HAIL
-
Real Estate
IOO
HAIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IOO vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank
IOO
HAIL
IOO vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IOO | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.32 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 3.14 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.94 | 9.49 | +8.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IOO | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 2.00 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | -0.17 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.20 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
IOO vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, smaller than the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and HAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IOO | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.85% | -65.98% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.94% | -18.64% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -40.96% | +21.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.52% | -63.12% | +39.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -30.85% | +29.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -31.60% | +20.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 6.15% | -4.01% |
Volatility
IOO vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) is 3.81%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that IOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IOO | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 10.80% | -6.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.59% | 22.28% | -11.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 29.32% | -15.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 31.80% | -14.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 31.73% | -13.95% |
IOO vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IOO vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison
IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than HAIL's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.44% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IOO and HAIL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAIL has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to IOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOO dropped -55.85% vs HAIL's -65.98%.
On 5-year performance, IOO leads with 16.68% vs -5.36% for HAIL. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.68% return vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HAIL.
HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.
IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net), while HAIL tracks S&P Kensho Smart Transportation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IOO and 0.45% for HAIL.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IOO and HAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer