IOEZX vs. ICBMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IOEZX (ICON Equity Income Fund) and ICBMX (ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - IOEZX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by ICON Funds, while ICBMX is a Energy Equities fund managed by ICON Funds. Over the past 10 years, IOEZX returned 8.56%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for ICBMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IOEZX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for ICBMX.

Performance

IOEZX vs. ICBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICON Equity Income Fund (IOEZX) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOEZX achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than ICBMX's 22.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IOEZX has underperformed ICBMX with an annualized return of 8.56%, while ICBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.

IOEZX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 13.83%
• 6M: 15.02%
• 1Y: 27.35%
• 3Y*: 12.80%
• 5Y*: 4.43%
• 10Y*: 8.56%

ICBMX

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 22.35%
• 6M: 21.90%
• 1Y: 47.97%
• 3Y*: 23.32%
• 5Y*: 14.25%
• 10Y*: 13.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IOEZX vs. ICBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IOEZX ICON Equity Income Fund	13.83%	14.29%	6.12%	3.82%	-13.56%	24.15%	3.16%	27.70%	-10.11%	13.59%
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund	22.35%	15.95%	21.25%	11.02%	0.50%	30.63%	5.53%	22.11%	-17.38%	16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IOEZX and ICBMX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2004	0.82

The correlation between IOEZX and ICBMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IOEZX vs. ICBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IOEZX

IOEZX Risk / Return Rank: 70
IOEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
IOEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IOEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IOEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IOEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ICBMX

ICBMX Risk / Return Rank: 78
ICBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ICBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ICBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ICBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ICBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOEZX vs. ICBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICON Equity Income Fund (IOEZX) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IOEZX	ICBMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.55	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.58	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	5.08	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.74	18.21	-2.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IOEZX vs. ICBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOEZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the ICBMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOEZX and ICBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IOEZX	ICBMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.55	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.69	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.59	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.30	+0.11

Drawdowns

IOEZX vs. ICBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOEZX drawdown since its inception was -56.15%, smaller than the maximum ICBMX drawdown of -63.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOEZX and ICBMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IOEZX	ICBMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.15%	-63.92%	+7.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.77%	-10.10%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.95%	-26.49%	+12.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.47%	-26.49%	+5.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.12%	-48.18%	+10.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	0.00%	-2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.58%	-17.88%	+9.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	2.81%	-1.04%

Volatility

IOEZX vs. ICBMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICON Equity Income Fund (IOEZX) is 3.68%, while ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that IOEZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IOEZX	ICBMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	5.00%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	13.24%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.05%	20.16%	-8.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.83%	20.76%	-6.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.48%	22.31%	-5.83%

IOEZX vs. ICBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOEZX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ICBMX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

IOEZX vs. ICBMX - Dividend Comparison

IOEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than ICBMX's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund	8.18%	10.01%	17.24%	7.07%	11.07%	1.32%	0.32%	1.55%	21.58%	1.19%	0.53%	7.78%
IOEZX ICON Equity Income Fund	2.97%	3.56%	4.32%	3.75%	13.63%	12.92%	3.68%	4.74%	3.80%	3.13%	3.32%	4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IOEZX and ICBMX in my portfolio?

IOEZX and ICBMX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IOEZX or ICBMX?

ICBMX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to IOEZX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IOEZX dropped -56.15% vs ICBMX's -63.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.