PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INXG.L vs. TP05.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INXG.L vs. TP05.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INXG.L is traded in GBP, while TP05.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TP05.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INXG.L achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than TP05.L's -0.38% return.


INXG.L

1D
0.44%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
-0.63%
5Y*
-8.26%
10Y*
-1.18%

TP05.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
-3.94%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INXG.L vs. TP05.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
0.04%1.10%-8.66%0.16%-34.27%4.08%11.08%6.27%-0.49%-1.89%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.38%-6.85%-0.44%-6.21%8.40%6.35%-1.65%-1.59%3.26%-4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between INXG.L and TP05.L is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.13

The correlation between INXG.L and TP05.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INXG.L vs. TP05.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INXG.L
INXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
INXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
INXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
INXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
INXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

TP05.L
TP05.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TP05.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TP05.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TP05.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TP05.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TP05.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INXG.L vs. TP05.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) and iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INXG.LTP05.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.00

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

-0.03

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

-0.07

+1.15

INXG.L vs. TP05.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the TP05.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INXG.L and TP05.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INXG.LTP05.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

-0.03

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

0.02

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

-0.06

-0.65

Drawdowns

INXG.L vs. TP05.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INXG.L drawdown since its inception was -99.05%, which is greater than TP05.L's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INXG.L and TP05.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INXG.LTP05.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.05%

-23.61%

-75.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.62%

-7.76%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-15.39%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.87%

-23.61%

-27.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.31%

-22.31%

-76.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.27%

-10.24%

-87.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.88%

-0.82%

Volatility

INXG.L vs. TP05.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) at 3.02%. This indicates that INXG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TP05.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INXG.LTP05.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.02%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

5.23%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

7.68%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.07%

8.80%

+11.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

8.99%

+8.48%

INXG.L vs. TP05.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INXG.L and TP05.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

INXG.L vs. TP05.L - Dividend Comparison

INXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than TP05.L's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
7.56%7.23%5.77%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.61%1.36%1.95%1.28%0.65%1.94%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.06%0.06%0.07%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INXG.L and TP05.L have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INXG.L and TP05.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

INXG.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while TP05.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. INXG.L tracks Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while TP05.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INXG.L and TP05.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer