PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVN vs. FRTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INVN vs. FRTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVN achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than FRTY's 5.48% return.


INVN

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.03%
6M
18.92%
YTD
9.96%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.69%

FRTY

1D
0.52%
1M
-4.84%
6M
5.40%
YTD
5.48%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$353.31K$584.27K$524.74K
$258.38K$157.49K$106.45K

INVN vs. FRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
INVN
Alger Russell Innovation ETF
9.96%6.56%
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
5.48%7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between INVN and FRTY is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025

0.43

The correlation between INVN and FRTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVN vs. FRTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INVN
INVN Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
INVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
INVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FRTY
FRTY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INVN vs. FRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INVNFRTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.08

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.46

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

1.12

+1.77

INVN vs. FRTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the FRTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVN and FRTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INVN vs. FRTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVN drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, smaller than the maximum FRTY drawdown of -53.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVN and FRTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVNFRTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.01%

-53.15%

+27.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.39%

-19.75%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-10.52%

+8.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-27.30%

+19.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.06%

8.09%

-0.03%

Volatility

INVN vs. FRTY - Volatility Comparison

Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) have volatilities of 9.21% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVNFRTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

9.32%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.77%

21.49%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.55%

27.75%

-4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.39%

27.66%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.39%

27.33%

-2.94%

INVN vs. FRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

INVN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FRTY's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

INVN vs. FRTY - Dividend Comparison

INVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than FRTY's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
0.18%0.19%0.10%0.00%0.00%5.35%
INVN
Alger Russell Innovation ETF
0.26%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INVN and FRTY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRTY has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to INVN (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVN dropped -26.01% vs FRTY's -53.15%.

On 1-year performance, INVN leads with 24.54% vs 12.22% for FRTY. On fees, INVN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, INVN has been the lower-risk option at 9.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INVN has performed better with a 24.54% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INVN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FRTY.

INVN has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.18% for FRTY.

INVN is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FRTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for INVN and 0.60% for FRTY.

INVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVN and FRTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer