PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INVN vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INVN vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVN achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.64% return.


INVN

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-5.37%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IJH

1D
-1.01%
1M
2.70%
YTD
14.64%
6M
12.56%
1Y
25.12%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INVN vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
INVN
Alger Russell Innovation ETF
-4.42%6.56%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
14.64%6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between INVN and IJH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025

0.66

The correlation between INVN and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INVN vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVN
INVN Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
INVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
INVN Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
INVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
INVN Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INVN vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INVNIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.28

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

2.86

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.39

10.44

-9.05

INVN vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVN and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INVN vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVN drawdown since its inception was -26.01%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVN and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INVNIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.01%

-55.07%

+29.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.39%

-8.83%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.82%

-1.13%

-8.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-7.55%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.98%

2.41%

+5.57%

Volatility

INVN vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

Alger Russell Innovation ETF (INVN) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 4.75%. This indicates that INVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INVNIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.06%

4.75%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.99%

11.75%

+6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.67%

15.88%

+5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.77%

19.76%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

21.17%

+2.60%

INVN vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

INVN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

INVN vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

INVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than IJH's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.18%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%
INVN
Alger Russell Innovation ETF
0.30%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INVN and IJH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INVN has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to IJH (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVN dropped -26.01% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 1-year performance, IJH leads with 25.12% vs 11.07% for INVN. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IJH has performed better with a 25.12% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for INVN.

IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.30% for INVN.

INVN tracks Alger Russell Innovation Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Alger and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for INVN and 0.05% for IJH.

IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INVN and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer