INVH vs. LIT
INVH (Invitation Homes Inc.) is a stock, while LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Over the past 5 years, INVH returned -2.13%/yr vs -1.44%/yr for LIT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INVH vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INVH achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 6.62% return.
INVH
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- YTD
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- -1.38%
- 3Y*
- -1.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.13%
- 10Y*
- —
LIT
- 1D
- -3.10%
- 1M
- -17.28%
- 6M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 1Y
- 74.54%
- 3Y*
- 1.61%
- 5Y*
- -1.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
INVH vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INVH Invitation Homes Inc. | 11.93% | -9.68% | -3.13% | 19.71% | -33.04% | 55.58% | 1.19% | 52.27% | -13.10% | 18.44% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 6.62% | 60.05% | -19.19% | -12.18% | -29.91% | 36.74% | 127.88% | 3.27% | -28.63% | 50.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between INVH and LIT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.23 |
The correlation between INVH and LIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INVH vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank
INVH
LIT
INVH vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INVH | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.34 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 3.06 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 11.23 | -11.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INVH vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INVH drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVH and LIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INVH | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -65.91% | +15.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.60% | -24.52% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.87% | -52.25% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.44% | -65.91% | +27.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.49% | -25.45% | +3.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.47% | -33.50% | +20.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.95% | 6.66% | +6.29% |
Volatility
INVH vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) is 6.26%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that INVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INVH | LIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 8.66% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.48% | 24.70% | -9.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.44% | 34.54% | -13.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 32.07% | -8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 30.74% | -5.26% |
Dividends
INVH vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
INVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than LIT's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INVH Invitation Homes Inc. | 3.91% | 4.21% | 3.53% | 3.87% | 2.97% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.74% | 2.19% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.73% | 0.49% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INVH and LIT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIT has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to INVH (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVH dropped -50.54% vs LIT's -65.91%.
LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INVH and LIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer