PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
INVH vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between INVH and FANG is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

INVH vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.30%
-16.56%
INVH
FANG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

INVH:

0.10

FANG:

-0.21

Sortino Ratio

INVH:

0.26

FANG:

-0.11

Omega Ratio

INVH:

1.03

FANG:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

INVH:

0.07

FANG:

-0.22

Martin Ratio

INVH:

0.25

FANG:

-0.47

Ulcer Index

INVH:

7.68%

FANG:

11.98%

Daily Std Dev

INVH:

19.89%

FANG:

26.78%

Max Drawdown

INVH:

-50.54%

FANG:

-88.72%

Current Drawdown

INVH:

-21.69%

FANG:

-21.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVH:

$19.45B

FANG:

$46.79B

EPS

INVH:

$0.72

FANG:

$17.32

PE Ratio

INVH:

44.10

FANG:

9.25

PEG Ratio

INVH:

14.77

FANG:

1.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVH:

$2.00B

FANG:

$7.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVH:

$849.12M

FANG:

$4.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

INVH:

$1.51B

FANG:

$4.93B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVH achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's -1.06% return.


INVH

YTD

0.84%

1M

3.33%

6M

-8.77%

1Y

0.37%

5Y*

3.23%

10Y*

N/A

FANG

YTD

-1.06%

1M

-8.40%

6M

-15.04%

1Y

-5.81%

5Y*

21.50%

10Y*

10.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

INVH vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INVH is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INVH is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INVH is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INVH is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INVH is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INVH is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

INVH vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.10-0.21
The chart of Sortino ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.26-0.11
The chart of Omega ratio for INVH, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.030.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.07-0.22
The chart of Martin ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.25-0.47
INVH
FANG

The current INVH Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVH and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.10
-0.21
INVH
FANG

Dividends

INVH vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

INVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than FANG's 5.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
3.50%3.53%3.87%2.97%1.50%2.02%1.74%2.19%0.93%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
5.11%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%

Drawdowns

INVH vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVH drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVH and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-21.69%
-21.85%
INVH
FANG

Volatility

INVH vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) is 4.27%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that INVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.27%
7.80%
INVH
FANG

Financials

INVH vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invitation Homes Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab