PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
INVH vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


INVHFANG
YTD Return-5.70%17.83%
1Y Return2.28%15.17%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.46%22.52%
5Y Return (Ann)3.88%19.39%
Sharpe Ratio0.460.64
Sortino Ratio0.771.04
Omega Ratio1.101.13
Calmar Ratio0.340.89
Martin Ratio2.362.48
Ulcer Index4.19%6.89%
Daily Std Dev21.60%26.91%
Max Drawdown-50.54%-88.72%
Current Drawdown-24.41%-15.65%

Fundamentals


INVHFANG
Market Cap$19.24B$51.71B
EPS$0.72$19.32
PE Ratio43.619.10
PEG Ratio14.541.20
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.63B$6.93B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.08B$3.66B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.68B$4.91B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between INVH and FANG is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

INVH vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, INVH achieves a -5.70% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 17.83% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%140.00%150.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
87.44%
108.00%
INVH
FANG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

INVH vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INVH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.46
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for INVH, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for INVH, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.36
FANG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FANG, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FANG, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FANG, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.48

INVH vs. FANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INVH Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVH and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.46
0.64
INVH
FANG

Dividends

INVH vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

INVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than FANG's 6.12% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
4.39%3.87%2.97%1.50%2.02%1.74%2.19%0.93%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
6.12%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%

Drawdowns

INVH vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVH drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVH and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.41%
-15.65%
INVH
FANG

Volatility

INVH vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) is 7.84%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 9.62%. This indicates that INVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.84%
9.62%
INVH
FANG

Financials

INVH vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invitation Homes Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items