PortfoliosLab logo
INVH vs. FANG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between INVH and FANG is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

INVH vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
105.73%
63.04%
INVH
FANG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

INVH:

0.17

FANG:

-0.79

Sortino Ratio

INVH:

0.37

FANG:

-0.95

Omega Ratio

INVH:

1.05

FANG:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

INVH:

0.14

FANG:

-0.72

Martin Ratio

INVH:

0.43

FANG:

-1.76

Ulcer Index

INVH:

8.43%

FANG:

17.35%

Daily Std Dev

INVH:

22.22%

FANG:

38.41%

Max Drawdown

INVH:

-50.54%

FANG:

-88.72%

Current Drawdown

INVH:

-17.03%

FANG:

-33.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INVH:

$20.87B

FANG:

$40.48B

EPS

INVH:

$0.74

FANG:

$15.52

PE Ratio

INVH:

45.88

FANG:

8.80

PEG Ratio

INVH:

13.55

FANG:

1.20

PS Ratio

INVH:

8.06

FANG:

3.80

PB Ratio

INVH:

2.13

FANG:

1.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

INVH:

$1.99B

FANG:

$8.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INVH:

$1.01B

FANG:

$6.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

INVH:

$1.36B

FANG:

$6.11B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INVH achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than FANG's -16.30% return.


INVH

YTD

6.84%

1M

0.26%

6M

0.42%

1Y

2.06%

5Y*

12.38%

10Y*

N/A

FANG

YTD

-16.30%

1M

-15.74%

6M

-23.83%

1Y

-31.38%

5Y*

36.64%

10Y*

8.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

INVH vs. FANG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INVH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INVH is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INVH is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INVH is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INVH is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INVH is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INVH is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

INVH vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
INVH: 0.17
FANG: -0.79
The chart of Sortino ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
INVH: 0.37
FANG: -0.95
The chart of Omega ratio for INVH, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
INVH: 1.05
FANG: 0.87
The chart of Calmar ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
INVH: 0.14
FANG: -0.72
The chart of Martin ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
INVH: 0.43
FANG: -1.76

The current INVH Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INVH and FANG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.17
-0.79
INVH
FANG

Dividends

INVH vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

INVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than FANG's 4.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
3.37%3.53%3.87%2.97%1.50%2.02%1.74%2.19%0.93%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.56%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%

Drawdowns

INVH vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INVH drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVH and FANG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-17.03%
-33.89%
INVH
FANG

Volatility

INVH vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) is 9.97%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 27.09%. This indicates that INVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.97%
27.09%
INVH
FANG

Financials

INVH vs. FANG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invitation Homes Inc. and Diamondback Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items