INVG vs. IBDR
INVG (GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF) and IBDR (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. INVG is actively managed, while IBDR is passively managed. Over the past year, INVG returned 5.23% vs 4.30% for IBDR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INVG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBDR.
Performance
INVG vs. IBDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INVG achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than IBDR's 1.69% return.
INVG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
INVG vs. IBDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF | 0.96% | 5.03% |
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 1.69% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between INVG and IBDR is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INVG vs. IBDR — Risk / Return Rank
INVG
IBDR
INVG vs. IBDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INVG | IBDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 3.36 | -2.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 52.23 | -50.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 181.59 | -176.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INVG vs. IBDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INVG drawdown since its inception was -3.15%, smaller than the maximum IBDR drawdown of -16.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INVG and IBDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INVG | IBDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -16.06% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -0.08% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | 0.00% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -2.82% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.02% | +0.97% |
Volatility
INVG vs. IBDR - Volatility Comparison
GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF (INVG) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF (IBDR) at 0.18%. This indicates that INVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INVG | IBDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 0.18% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.41% | 0.35% | +3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 0.63% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 3.39% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 4.85% | -0.40% |
INVG vs. IBDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
INVG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
INVG vs. IBDR - Dividend Comparison
INVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than IBDR's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDR iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF | 4.12% | 4.20% | 4.13% | 3.41% | 2.44% | 2.11% | 2.61% | 3.25% | 3.56% | 3.22% | 0.86% |
INVG GMO Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF | 4.66% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INVG and IBDR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INVG has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to IBDR (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INVG dropped -3.15% vs IBDR's -16.06%.
On 1-year performance, INVG leads with 5.23% vs 4.30% for IBDR. On fees, IBDR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INVG has performed better with a 5.23% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for INVG.
INVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.12% for IBDR.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for INVG and 0.10% for IBDR.
IBDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.83 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INVG and IBDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer