INTU vs. GIB
INTU (Intuit Inc.) and GIB (CGI Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — INTU in Software - Application, GIB in Information Technology Services. Over the past 10 years, INTU returned 12.10%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for GIB. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
INTU vs. GIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTU achieves a -51.84% return, which is significantly lower than GIB's -20.45% return. Over the past 10 years, INTU has outperformed GIB with an annualized return of 12.10%, while GIB has yielded a comparatively lower 4.25% annualized return.
INTU
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 18.87%
- 6M
- -36.17%
- YTD
- -51.84%
- 1Y
- -59.29%
- 3Y*
- -13.98%
- 5Y*
- -9.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.08%
GIB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 11.73%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- YTD
- -20.45%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- -9.95%
- 5Y*
- -4.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | $41.80M | $36.08M | $33.67M |
INTU Intuit Inc. | $1.23B | $1.26B | $1.61B |
INTU vs. GIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTU Intuit Inc. | -51.84% | 6.09% | 1.16% | 61.76% | -39.12% | 70.27% | 46.12% | 34.11% | 25.86% | 39.21% |
GIB CGI Inc | -20.45% | -15.19% | 2.07% | 24.47% | -2.68% | 11.59% | -5.26% | 36.80% | 12.63% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTU and GIB is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 1998 | 0.31 |
The correlation between INTU and GIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INTU:
$86.46B
GIB:
$15.64B
INTU:
$16.41
GIB:
CA$7.71
INTU:
19.26
GIB:
13.29
INTU:
1.15
GIB:
1.67
INTU:
4.22
GIB:
1.36
INTU:
4.23
GIB:
2.18
INTU:
$20.93B
GIB:
CA$16.35B
INTU:
$16.97B
GIB:
CA$3.35B
INTU:
$6.65B
GIB:
CA$2.98B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTU vs. GIB — Risk / Return Rank
INTU
GIB
INTU vs. GIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuit Inc. (INTU) and CGI Inc (GIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTU | GIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.87 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.65 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | -1.16 | -0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTU vs. GIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTU drawdown since its inception was -75.29%, smaller than the maximum GIB drawdown of -86.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTU and GIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTU | GIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.29% | -86.78% | +11.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.28% | -36.77% | -30.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.19% | -49.54% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.19% | -49.54% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.19% | -49.54% | -18.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.41% | -39.76% | -20.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -32.55% | +8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.92% | 20.44% | +19.48% |
Volatility
INTU vs. GIB - Volatility Comparison
Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to CGI Inc (GIB) at 10.64%. This indicates that INTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTU | GIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.50% | 10.64% | +3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.81% | 26.97% | +16.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.33% | 30.79% | +16.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 23.49% | +14.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.35% | 22.76% | +11.59% |
Dividends
INTU vs. GIB - Dividend Comparison
INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than GIB's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIB CGI Inc | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INTU Intuit Inc. | 1.52% | 0.65% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.72% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.74% | 0.83% | 0.89% | 1.08% | 1.09% |
Financials
INTU vs. GIB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuit Inc. and CGI Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INTU vs. GIB - Profitability Comparison
INTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.24B and revenue of 8.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
GIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
INTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.
GIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
INTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 3.06B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in a net margin of 35.8%.
GIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 445.87M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTU and GIB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTU has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to GIB (10.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTU dropped -75.29% vs GIB's -86.78%.
GIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTU and GIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer