INTU vs. MSFT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Intuit Inc. (INTU) and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO).

Performance

INTU vs. MSFT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuit Inc. (INTU) and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INTU vs. MSFT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
INTU Intuit Inc.	-34.61%	6.09%	1.16%	61.76%	-39.12%	20.75%
MSFT.TO Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)	-24.65%	18.05%	2.47%	59.91%	-33.99%	15.81%

Different Trading Currencies

INTU is traded in USD, while MSFT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MSFT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTU achieves a -34.61% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT.TO's -26.94% return.

INTU

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 5.71%
• YTD: -34.61%
• 6M: -36.45%
• 1Y: -29.10%
• 3Y*: -0.37%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 16.13%

MSFT.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -10.73%
• YTD: -26.94%
• 6M: -31.20%
• 1Y: -2.66%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

INTU vs. MSFT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTU

INTU Risk / Return Rank: 16
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 12
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 20

MSFT.TO

MSFT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 35
MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MSFT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MSFT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTU vs. MSFT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuit Inc. (INTU) and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INTU	MSFT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	-0.10	-0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.02	0.06	-1.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.01	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	-0.12	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.17	-0.34	-0.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INTU vs. MSFT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTU and MSFT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INTU	MSFT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81	-0.10	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.06	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between INTU and MSFT.TO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

INTU vs. MSFT.TO - Dividend Comparison

INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than MSFT.TO's 0.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTU Intuit Inc.	1.04%	0.65%	0.60%	0.52%	0.72%	0.38%	0.57%	0.74%	0.83%	0.89%	1.08%	1.09%
MSFT.TO Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.95%	0.71%	0.73%	0.75%	1.07%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

INTU vs. MSFT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTU drawdown since its inception was -75.29%, which is greater than MSFT.TO's maximum drawdown of -42.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTU and MSFT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTU	MSFT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.29%	-37.95%	-37.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.41%	-34.43%	-20.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.25%	-32.18%	-14.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.96%	-11.89%	-12.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.43%	12.81%	+10.62%

Volatility

INTU vs. MSFT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a higher volatility of 13.30% compared to Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) at 6.22%. This indicates that INTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INTU	MSFT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.30%	6.22%	+7.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.96%	19.79%	+9.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.12%	27.62%	+8.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.09%	29.48%	+5.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.53%	29.48%	+3.05%

Financials