INTM vs. XLG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

INTM (Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Invesco, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. INTM is actively managed, while XLG is passively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

INTM vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTM achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 4.04% return.

INTM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: 1.75%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 4.65%
• YTD: 4.04%
• 1Y: 17.00%
• 3Y*: 20.89%
• 5Y*: 14.20%
• 10Y*: 16.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTM vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.34%	4.72%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	4.04%	12.06%

Correlation

The correlation between INTM and XLG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

INTM vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 37
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTM vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INTM	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.70	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.38	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.56	—

Drawdowns

INTM vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTM drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTM and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTM	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-52.39%	+49.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-4.68%	+4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-7.63%	+7.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INTM	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.16%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51%	14.20%	-11.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.51%	18.83%	-16.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.51%	18.87%	-16.36%

INTM vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

INTM vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

INTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than XLG's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.92%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.65%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INTM and XLG in my portfolio?

INTM and XLG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INTM or XLG?

On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INTM or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for INTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INTM or XLG?

INTM has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.65% for XLG.

What is the main difference between INTM and XLG?

INTM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for INTM and 0.20% for XLG.