INTM vs. MMMA

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

INTM (Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF) and MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

INTM vs. MMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTM achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than MMMA's 3.53% return.

INTM

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 6M: 2.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMMA

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTM vs. MMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.64%	0.49%
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF	3.53%	0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between INTM and MMMA is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

INTM vs. MMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

INTM vs. MMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTM drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, smaller than the maximum MMMA drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTM and MMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTM	MMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-2.79%	+0.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	0.00%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.47%	-0.56%	+0.09%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	INTM	MMMA	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52%	4.06%	-1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.52%	4.06%	-1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.52%	4.06%	-1.54%

INTM vs. MMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INTM and MMMA have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

INTM vs. MMMA - Dividend Comparison

INTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than MMMA's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.60%	1.15%
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF	1.95%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INTM and MMMA in my portfolio?

INTM and MMMA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INTM or MMMA?

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INTM or MMMA?

INTM and MMMA have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INTM or MMMA?

INTM has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.95% for MMMA.

What is the main difference between INTM and MMMA?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and NYLI.