PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTL vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTL vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main International ETF (INTL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.71% return.


INTL

1D
0.79%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
9.95%
6M
10.07%
1Y
23.96%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
10Y*

VEA

1D
1.25%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
14.71%
6M
14.32%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
INTL
Main International ETF
9.95%29.55%2.00%18.20%-1.69%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.71%35.16%3.15%17.93%-3.01%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL and VEA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022

0.93

The correlation between INTL and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

INTL vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INTL
VEA

Financial Services

23.4%
22.3%

Technology

17.6%
16.6%

Industrials

14.7%
17.5%

Basic Materials

9.9%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
7.4%

Healthcare

6.2%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
5.5%

Energy

5.4%
4.7%

Communication Services

4.6%
3.2%

Utilities

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.5%

Financial Services

INTL
23.4%
VEA
22.3%

Technology

INTL
17.6%
VEA
16.6%

Industrials

INTL
14.7%
VEA
17.5%

Basic Materials

INTL
9.9%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

INTL
7.6%
VEA
7.4%

Healthcare

INTL
6.2%
VEA
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

INTL
5.4%
VEA
5.5%

Energy

INTL
5.4%
VEA
4.7%

Communication Services

INTL
4.6%
VEA
3.2%

Utilities

INTL
3.0%
VEA
3.0%

Real Estate

INTL
2.1%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTL vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTL
INTL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main International ETF (INTL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTLVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.68

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

10.30

-2.21

INTL vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTL vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTLVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.48%

-60.68%

+46.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-11.63%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-13.45%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-1.70%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-13.25%

+10.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.02%

-0.05%

Volatility

INTL vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

Main International ETF (INTL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 6.74% and 6.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTLVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

6.94%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

14.77%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.34%

16.78%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

16.77%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

17.20%

-1.46%

INTL vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTL vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

INTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than VEA's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTL
Main International ETF
3.40%2.57%2.71%2.86%1.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.55%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, INTL and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to INTL (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTL dropped -14.48% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 3-year performance, VEA leads with 19.91% vs 16.45% for INTL. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, INTL has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VEA has performed better with a 19.91% return vs 16.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for INTL.

INTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.55% for VEA.

They also come from different issuers: Main Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for INTL and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTL and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer