INTF vs. SCHD
INTF (iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INTF returned 9.89%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for SCHD. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INTF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
INTF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, INTF has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.89%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
INTF
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 26.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
INTF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF | 9.41% | 35.50% | 5.99% | 18.25% | -12.31% | 11.70% | 2.83% | 18.46% | -15.87% | 28.46% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTF and SCHD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015 | 0.66 |
The correlation between INTF and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INTF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INTF
SCHD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INTF
SCHD
Industrials
INTF
SCHD
Technology
INTF
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
INTF
SCHD
Healthcare
INTF
SCHD
Basic Materials
INTF
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
INTF
SCHD
Energy
INTF
SCHD
Utilities
INTF
SCHD
Communication Services
INTF
SCHD
Real Estate
INTF
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
INTF
SCHD
INTF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 5.35 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 12.94 | -2.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.39% | -33.37% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -4.61% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -16.13% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -16.85% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.39% | -33.37% | -7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -2.47% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -3.31% | -4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 1.90% | +0.67% |
Volatility
INTF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that INTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 3.58% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 7.73% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 11.07% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 14.36% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 16.71% | +0.41% |
INTF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF | 3.06% | 2.87% | 3.53% | 3.59% | 2.81% | 5.38% | 2.06% | 3.65% | 2.62% | 3.26% | 1.66% | 0.85% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTF has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTF dropped -40.39% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.72% vs 9.89% for INTF. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INTF.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 3.06% for INTF.
INTF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INTF and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTF and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer