PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTF vs. IDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTF vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with INTF having a 10.41% return and IDEV slightly lower at 9.92%.


INTF

1D
0.55%
1M
1.96%
YTD
10.41%
6M
14.13%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
9.25%

IDEV

1D
0.62%
1M
2.82%
YTD
9.92%
6M
13.26%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTF vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
10.41%35.50%5.99%18.25%-12.31%11.70%2.83%18.46%-15.87%19.41%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
9.92%32.56%4.54%17.36%-14.99%13.00%8.32%23.12%-14.10%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between INTF and IDEV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.96

The correlation between INTF and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

INTF vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INTF
IDEV

Financial Services

25.2%
24.2%

Industrials

19.1%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
7.7%

Technology

8.5%
9.9%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.6%

Basic Materials

6.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
6.0%

Energy

5.9%
5.9%

Utilities

4.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
4.0%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.9%

Financial Services

INTF
25.2%
IDEV
24.2%

Industrials

INTF
19.1%
IDEV
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

INTF
9.0%
IDEV
7.7%

Technology

INTF
8.5%
IDEV
9.9%

Healthcare

INTF
8.2%
IDEV
8.6%

Basic Materials

INTF
6.6%
IDEV
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

INTF
6.3%
IDEV
6.0%

Energy

INTF
5.9%
IDEV
5.9%

Utilities

INTF
4.7%
IDEV
3.7%

Communication Services

INTF
3.9%
IDEV
4.0%

Real Estate

INTF
2.7%
IDEV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTF vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTF
INTF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTF vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTFIDEVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.62

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

2.31

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.22

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.44

8.73

+1.71

INTF vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTF and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTFIDEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.62

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.55

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.55

-0.10

Drawdowns

INTF vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, which is greater than IDEV's maximum drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and IDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTFIDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.39%

-34.77%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-11.20%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.64%

-13.41%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.26%

-29.15%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.08%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-6.57%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.85%

-0.28%

Volatility

INTF vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) have volatilities of 4.65% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTFIDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

4.71%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

12.07%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.57%

14.52%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

16.26%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

17.27%

+0.08%

INTF vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTF vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than IDEV's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.10%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%0.00%0.00%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
2.60%2.87%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.26%1.66%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, INTF and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IDEV has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to INTF (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTF dropped -40.39% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

On 5-year performance, INTF leads with 9.90% vs 8.88% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INTF has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INTF.

IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.60% for INTF.

INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INTF and 0.05% for IDEV.

INTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTF and IDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer