INTF vs. FID
INTF (iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - INTF tracks the MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor while FID tracks the S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INTF returned 9.49%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for FID. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INTF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
INTF vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 8.56% return.
INTF
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
FID
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
INTF vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF | 9.48% | 35.50% | 5.99% | 18.25% | -12.31% | 11.70% | 2.83% | 18.46% | -14.83% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.56% | 32.07% | 5.42% | 9.92% | -9.69% | 12.90% | -7.56% | 20.82% | -8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTF and FID is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between INTF and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
INTF vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INTF
FID
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
INTF
FID
Industrials
INTF
FID
Consumer Cyclical
INTF
FID
Technology
INTF
FID
Healthcare
INTF
FID
Basic Materials
INTF
FID
Consumer Defensive
INTF
FID
Energy
INTF
FID
Utilities
INTF
FID
Communication Services
INTF
FID
Real Estate
INTF
FID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTF vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
INTF
FID
INTF vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTF | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.30 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 3.26 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.62 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.82 | 9.14 | +0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTF | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.30 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.46 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.39 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
INTF vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, roughly equal to the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTF | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.39% | -39.79% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -8.93% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -10.97% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -29.13% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -1.11% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -8.47% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.55% | +0.02% |
Volatility
INTF vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 3.00%. This indicates that INTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTF | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.00% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 8.12% | +3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 10.16% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 17.04% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 18.96% | -1.61% |
INTF vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTF vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than FID's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.02% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF | 2.62% | 2.87% | 3.53% | 3.59% | 2.81% | 5.38% | 2.06% | 3.65% | 2.62% | 3.26% | 1.66% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTF and FID have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTF has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTF dropped -40.39% vs FID's -39.79%.
On 5-year performance, INTF leads with 9.49% vs 7.74% for FID. On fees, INTF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, INTF has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INTF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.62% for INTF.
INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INTF and 0.60% for FID.
FID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTF and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer