PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTF vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTF vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTF achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 8.46% return.


INTF

1D
-0.84%
1M
2.45%
YTD
9.48%
6M
12.57%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
9.16%

BKIE

1D
-0.89%
1M
3.12%
YTD
8.46%
6M
11.11%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTF vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
9.48%35.50%5.99%18.25%-12.31%11.70%30.59%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.46%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between INTF and BKIE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.97

The correlation between INTF and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

INTF vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INTF
BKIE

Financial Services

25.2%
25.8%

Industrials

19.1%
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
7.3%

Technology

8.5%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.2%
9.1%

Basic Materials

6.6%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
6.2%

Energy

5.9%
5.9%

Utilities

4.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
4.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.0%

Financial Services

INTF
25.2%
BKIE
25.8%

Industrials

INTF
19.1%
BKIE
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

INTF
9.0%
BKIE
7.3%

Technology

INTF
8.5%
BKIE
10.1%

Healthcare

INTF
8.2%
BKIE
9.1%

Basic Materials

INTF
6.6%
BKIE
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

INTF
6.3%
BKIE
6.2%

Energy

INTF
5.9%
BKIE
5.9%

Utilities

INTF
4.7%
BKIE
3.7%

Communication Services

INTF
3.9%
BKIE
4.2%

Real Estate

INTF
2.7%
BKIE
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTF vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTF
INTF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTF vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTFBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.99

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.82

7.68

+2.15

INTF vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTF and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTFBKIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.56

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.56

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.92

-0.47

Drawdowns

INTF vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTF drawdown since its inception was -40.39%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTF and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTFBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.39%

-28.19%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-11.41%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.64%

-13.19%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.26%

-28.19%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.33%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-4.98%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.95%

-0.38%

Volatility

INTF vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTFBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.42%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

12.17%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

14.58%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

16.12%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

16.34%

+1.01%

INTF vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTF vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

INTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than BKIE's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.26%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
2.62%2.87%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.26%1.66%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, INTF and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

INTF has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to BKIE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTF dropped -40.39% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, INTF leads with 9.49% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INTF has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INTF.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.62% for INTF.

INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INTF and 0.04% for BKIE.

INTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTF and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer