PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTC vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTC vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intel Corporation (INTC) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTC achieves a 237.59% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, INTC has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 17.03%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


INTC

1D
6.51%
1M
14.53%
YTD
237.59%
6M
229.46%
1Y
518.52%
3Y*
55.34%
5Y*
18.67%
10Y*
17.03%

KMB

1D
0.74%
1M
8.12%
YTD
4.05%
6M
1.77%
1Y
-17.99%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTC vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTC
Intel Corporation
237.59%84.04%-59.57%94.56%-46.64%6.05%-14.69%30.71%4.23%30.87%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.05%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between INTC and KMB is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984

0.22

The correlation between INTC and KMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INTC:

$633.19B

KMB:

$34.08B

EPS

INTC:

-$0.67

KMB:

$5.93

PS Ratio

INTC:

10.91

KMB:

2.06

PB Ratio

INTC:

5.68

KMB:

18.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTC:

$53.76B

KMB:

$16.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTC:

$19.05B

KMB:

$5.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

INTC:

$8.83B

KMB:

$3.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTC vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTC vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intel Corporation (INTC) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INTCKMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

0.87

+0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.85

-0.67

+21.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.84

-1.03

+49.86

INTC vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTC Sharpe Ratio is 6.84, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTC and KMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INTC vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTC drawdown since its inception was -82.25%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTC and KMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTCKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.25%

-36.97%

-45.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.17%

-29.60%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.80%

-34.06%

-29.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.53%

-34.06%

-31.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.80%

-34.06%

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-26.52%

+22.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-8.85%

-27.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.30%

19.43%

-9.13%

Volatility

INTC vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

Intel Corporation (INTC) has a higher volatility of 24.56% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that INTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTCKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.56%

8.42%

+16.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.47%

16.67%

+41.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.69%

25.77%

+47.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.29%

20.19%

+32.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.20%

21.07%

+23.13%

Dividends

INTC vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.97%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%

Financials

INTC vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intel Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
13.58B
4.16B
(INTC) Total Revenue
(KMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INTC vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intel Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
39.4%
36.9%
Portfolio components
INTC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.35B and revenue of 13.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

INTC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of -3.14B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.1%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

INTC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -3.73B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in a net margin of -27.5%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INTC and KMB have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTC has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTC dropped -82.25% vs KMB's -36.97%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.84 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTC and KMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer