PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INSW vs. PMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INSW vs. PMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSW achieves a 65.57% return, which is significantly higher than PMT's -17.41% return.


INSW

1D
-0.71%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
65.57%
6M
56.10%
1Y
127.10%
3Y*
42.07%
5Y*
44.87%
10Y*

PMT

1D
-3.93%
1M
-17.26%
YTD
-17.41%
6M
-17.04%
1Y
-6.85%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
-1.60%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INSW vs. PMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
65.57%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%
PMT
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
-17.41%13.23%-5.38%36.11%-18.07%8.47%-12.99%30.33%28.04%9.42%

Correlation

The correlation between INSW and PMT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2016

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INSW:

$3.88B

PMT:

$872.56M

EPS

INSW:

$11.01

PMT:

$1.52

PE Ratio

INSW:

7.08

PMT:

6.59

PEG Ratio

INSW:

1.12

PMT:

0.05

PS Ratio

INSW:

5.72

PMT:

0.82

PB Ratio

INSW:

1.77

PMT:

0.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

INSW:

$675.87M

PMT:

$1.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INSW:

$274.33M

PMT:

$946.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

INSW:

$525.75M

PMT:

$966.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INSW vs. PMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PMT
PMT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSW vs. PMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INSWPMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.97

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.91

-0.28

+8.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.47

-0.73

+24.20

INSW vs. PMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSW Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the PMT Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSW and PMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INSWPMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49

-0.26

+3.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

-0.05

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.18

+0.43

Drawdowns

INSW vs. PMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSW drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum PMT drawdown of -75.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSW and PMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INSWPMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.49%

-75.90%

+18.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-24.94%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.40%

-24.94%

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.40%

-39.81%

-10.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.90%

-24.94%

+10.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-11.56%

-9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.44%

9.40%

-3.96%

Volatility

INSW vs. PMT - Volatility Comparison

International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) at 11.18%. This indicates that INSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INSWPMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

11.18%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.72%

21.88%

+5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.61%

26.43%

+10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.01%

29.56%

+11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.21%

45.18%

+0.03%

Dividends

INSW vs. PMT - Dividend Comparison

INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than PMT's 15.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
5.62%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PMT
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
15.97%12.75%12.71%10.70%14.61%10.85%8.64%8.43%10.10%11.70%11.48%14.15%

Financials

INSW vs. PMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Seaways, Inc. and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M0.00200.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
15.96M
3.37M
(INSW) Total Revenue
(PMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INSW and PMT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSW has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to PMT (11.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSW dropped -57.49% vs PMT's -75.90%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INSW and PMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer