INSW vs. AGRO
INSW (International Seaways, Inc.) and AGRO (Adecoagro S.A.) are both stocks. INSW operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while AGRO operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, INSW returned 56.61%/yr vs 3.87%/yr for AGRO. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
INSW vs. AGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INSW achieves a 116.16% return, which is significantly higher than AGRO's 26.83% return.
INSW
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 23.66%
- 6M
- 75.93%
- YTD
- 116.16%
- 1Y
- 171.90%
- 3Y*
- 47.43%
- 5Y*
- 56.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.02%
AGRO
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. | $7.27M | $6.92M | $10.04M |
| $46.42M | $43.17M | $49.32M |
INSW vs. AGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 116.16% | 44.97% | -10.85% | 42.93% | 162.53% | -2.93% | -44.43% | 76.72% | -8.78% | 31.48% |
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. | 26.83% | -12.37% | -12.39% | 38.60% | 11.50% | 12.94% | -18.76% | 20.26% | -32.69% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between INSW and AGRO is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016 | 0.20 |
The correlation between INSW and AGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INSW:
$4.76B
AGRO:
$5.62B
INSW:
$11.00
AGRO:
$0.03
INSW:
8.75
AGRO:
354.28
INSW:
1.38
AGRO:
0.11
INSW:
7.06
AGRO:
3.36
INSW:
2.18
AGRO:
2.91
INSW:
$675.87M
AGRO:
$1.50B
INSW:
$274.33M
AGRO:
$378.81M
INSW:
$525.75M
AGRO:
$466.25M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INSW vs. AGRO — Risk / Return Rank
INSW
AGRO
INSW vs. AGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) and Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INSW | AGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.08 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.70 | 0.30 | +10.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.60 | 0.72 | +28.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INSW vs. AGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INSW drawdown since its inception was -57.49%, smaller than the maximum AGRO drawdown of -73.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSW and AGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INSW | AGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.49% | -73.70% | +16.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -39.99% | +23.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.40% | -39.99% | -10.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.40% | -45.34% | -5.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -34.32% | +34.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.66% | -31.48% | +10.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 16.44% | -10.61% |
Volatility
INSW vs. AGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) is 13.15%, while Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) has a volatility of 14.49%. This indicates that INSW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INSW | AGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.15% | 14.49% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.53% | 41.25% | -11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.05% | 49.77% | -11.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.83% | 42.21% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.33% | 40.11% | +5.22% |
Dividends
INSW vs. AGRO - Dividend Comparison
INSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, more than AGRO's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRO Adecoagro S.A. | 2.97% | 4.41% | 3.63% | 2.95% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 8.66% | 6.04% | 16.05% | 13.83% | 3.84% | 9.26% | 1.47% |
Financials
INSW vs. AGRO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Seaways, Inc. and Adecoagro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
INSW and AGRO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGRO has higher volatility (14.49%) compared to INSW (13.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSW dropped -57.49% vs AGRO's -73.70%.
INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INSW and AGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer