INSM vs. NEM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

INSM (Insmed Incorporated) and NEM (Newmont Corporation) are both stocks. INSM operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, INSM returned 25.53%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for NEM. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

INSM vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSM achieves a -43.78% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, INSM has outperformed NEM with an annualized return of 25.53%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively lower 13.80% annualized return.

INSM

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -17.07%
• YTD: -43.78%
• 6M: -50.33%
• 1Y: 1.00%
• 3Y*: 71.44%
• 5Y*: 26.62%
• 10Y*: 25.53%

NEM

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -15.55%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 81.14%
• 3Y*: 36.14%
• 5Y*: 10.51%
• 10Y*: 13.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INSM vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INSM Insmed Incorporated	-43.78%	152.09%	122.78%	55.11%	-26.65%	-18.17%	39.41%	82.01%	-57.92%	135.68%
NEM Newmont Corporation	0.82%	172.82%	-7.83%	-8.76%	-20.77%	7.40%	40.28%	30.52%	-6.15%	10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between INSM and NEM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2000	0.05

The correlation between INSM and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS INSM : -$5.71 NEM : $6.34
PS Ratio INSM : 24.77 NEM : 4.83
Total Revenue (TTM) INSM : $819.56M NEM : $17.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) INSM : $668.55M NEM : $8.97B
EBITDA (TTM) INSM : -$1.14B NEM : $13.78B

Return for Risk

INSM vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSM

INSM Risk / Return Rank: 43
INSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
INSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
INSM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
INSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
INSM Martin Ratio Rank: 43

NEM

NEM Risk / Return Rank: 82
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSM vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INSM	NEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	1.73	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	2.08	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.29	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.02	2.78	-2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.04	7.58	-7.54

INSM vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSM and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INSM vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSM drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSM and NEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	INSM	NEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.65%	-81.30%	-17.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.54%	-29.39%	-27.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.54%	-36.57%	-19.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.54%	-62.40%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.84%	-62.40%	-2.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.72%	-23.71%	-30.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.07%	-41.37%	-44.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.68%	10.73%	+12.95%

Volatility

INSM vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Insmed Incorporated (INSM) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to Newmont Corporation (NEM) at 15.74%. This indicates that INSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INSM	NEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.27%	15.74%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.13%	37.43%	+8.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.05%	47.44%	+4.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.82%	37.99%	+34.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.49%	35.67%	+42.82%

Dividends

INSM vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

INSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INSM Insmed Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NEM Newmont Corporation	1.02%	1.00%	2.69%	3.87%	4.66%	3.55%	1.74%	3.31%	1.62%	0.67%	0.37%	0.56%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INSM and NEM in my portfolio?

INSM and NEM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INSM or NEM?

INSM has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to NEM (15.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSM dropped -98.65% vs NEM's -81.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.