PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INSM vs. ESLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INSM vs. ESLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INSM achieves a -43.78% return, which is significantly lower than ESLT's 48.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INSM having a 25.53% annualized return and ESLT not far ahead at 26.53%.


INSM

1D
1.17%
1M
-17.07%
YTD
-43.78%
6M
-50.33%
1Y
1.00%
3Y*
71.44%
5Y*
26.62%
10Y*
25.53%

ESLT

1D
-6.48%
1M
9.58%
YTD
48.00%
6M
66.16%
1Y
98.98%
3Y*
60.86%
5Y*
46.38%
10Y*
26.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INSM vs. ESLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INSM
Insmed Incorporated
-43.78%152.09%122.78%55.11%-26.65%-18.17%39.41%82.01%-57.92%135.68%
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
48.00%125.14%22.17%31.30%-4.82%34.77%-14.56%37.62%-13.22%32.65%

Correlation

The correlation between INSM and ESLT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2000

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INSM:

$21.08B

ESLT:

$41.10B

EPS

INSM:

-$5.71

ESLT:

$12.36

PS Ratio

INSM:

24.77

ESLT:

4.93

PB Ratio

INSM:

29.91

ESLT:

9.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

INSM:

$819.56M

ESLT:

$8.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INSM:

$668.55M

ESLT:

$2.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

INSM:

-$1.14B

ESLT:

$861.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INSM vs. ESLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INSM
INSM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
INSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
INSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ESLT
ESLT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ESLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INSM vs. ESLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Insmed Incorporated (INSM) and Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INSMESLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

3.83

-3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.04

10.61

-10.57

INSM vs. ESLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the ESLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INSM and ESLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INSM vs. ESLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INSM drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than ESLT's maximum drawdown of -53.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSM and ESLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INSMESLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.65%

-53.79%

-44.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.54%

-25.98%

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.54%

-25.98%

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.54%

-32.89%

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.84%

-32.89%

-31.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.72%

-15.71%

-38.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.07%

-13.91%

-72.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.68%

9.36%

+14.32%

Volatility

INSM vs. ESLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is 17.27%, while Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) has a volatility of 19.89%. This indicates that INSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INSMESLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.27%

19.89%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.13%

35.93%

+10.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.05%

44.11%

+7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.82%

33.66%

+39.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.49%

29.42%

+49.07%

Dividends

INSM vs. ESLT - Dividend Comparison

INSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESLT
Elbit Systems Ltd
0.36%0.47%0.77%0.94%1.22%1.03%1.28%1.14%1.54%1.32%1.57%1.63%
INSM
Insmed Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

INSM vs. ESLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Insmed Incorporated and Elbit Systems Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
305.96M
2.19B
(INSM) Total Revenue
(ESLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INSM vs. ESLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Insmed Incorporated and Elbit Systems Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
84.5%
25.2%
Portfolio components
INSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported a gross profit of 258.54M and revenue of 305.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.5%.

ESLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a gross profit of 552.06M and revenue of 2.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

INSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported an operating income of -198.20M and revenue of 305.96M, resulting in an operating margin of -64.8%.

ESLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported an operating income of 205.13M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

INSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Insmed Incorporated reported a net income of -163.56M and revenue of 305.96M, resulting in a net margin of -53.5%.

ESLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Elbit Systems Ltd reported a net income of 160.79M and revenue of 2.19B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INSM and ESLT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESLT has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to INSM (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INSM dropped -98.65% vs ESLT's -53.79%.

ESLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INSM and ESLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer