INRO vs. QUS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

INRO (Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. INRO is actively managed, while QUS is passively managed. Over the past year, INRO returned 25.01% vs 19.80% for QUS. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. INRO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.

Performance

INRO vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a 13.36% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 10.23% return.

INRO

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 0.61%
• 6M: 11.49%
• YTD: 13.36%
• 1Y: 25.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.72%

QUS

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 7.60%
• YTD: 10.23%
• 1Y: 19.80%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: 13.54%
• ALL TIME*: 12.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF	$39.97K	$73.33K	$85.26K
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	$3.01M	$4.81M	$3.43M

INRO vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF	13.36%	16.67%	10.92%
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	10.23%	14.13%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between INRO and QUS is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024	0.83

The correlation between INRO and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

INRO vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INRO	QUS
Technology	41.4%	28.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	5.7%
Industrials	10.1%	8.1%
Financial Services	9.6%	15.7%
Healthcare	8.5%	14.4%
Communication Services	7.9%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	8.3%
Energy	2.4%	3.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.6%
Utilities	0.1%	3.9%

Return for Risk

INRO vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

INRO

INRO Risk / Return Rank: 73
INRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
INRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
INRO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
INRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
INRO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QUS

QUS Risk / Return Rank: 85
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

INRO vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INRO	QUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.16	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	3.05	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.39	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.90	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.40	12.95	-1.55

INRO vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INRO and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INRO vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and QUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	INRO	QUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.02%	-33.78%	+13.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-6.85%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	0.00%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-3.66%	+1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	1.53%	+0.67%

Volatility

INRO vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.42%. This indicates that INRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INRO	QUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	2.42%	+2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.82%	6.97%	+4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.42%	9.22%	+5.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	14.32%	+2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	16.40%	+0.80%

INRO vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

INRO vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than QUS's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF	0.60%	0.68%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	1.27%	1.38%	1.49%	1.57%	1.68%	1.27%	1.73%	1.81%	2.12%	1.86%	2.07%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INRO and QUS in my portfolio?

INRO and QUS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INRO or QUS?

INRO has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to QUS (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INRO dropped -20.02% vs QUS's -33.78%.

Which ETF is better, INRO or QUS?

On 1-year performance, INRO leads with 25.01% vs 19.80% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INRO or QUS?

Over the 1-year period, INRO has performed better with a 25.01% return vs 19.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INRO or QUS?

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for INRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INRO or QUS?

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.60% for INRO.

What is the main difference between INRO and QUS?

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for INRO and 0.15% for QUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.