INRO vs. XLSR
INRO (Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF) and XLSR (SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INRO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while XLSR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INRO returned 31.94% vs 23.28% for XLSR. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. INRO charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for XLSR.
Performance
INRO vs. XLSR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLSR's 4.36% return.
INRO
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 13.07%
- 1Y
- 31.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLSR
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 23.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.86%
- 10Y*
- —
INRO vs. XLSR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF | 13.70% | 16.67% | 10.92% |
XLSR SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF | 4.36% | 17.34% | 7.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRO and XLSR is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between INRO and XLSR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
INRO vs. XLSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INRO
XLSR
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
INRO
XLSR
Consumer Cyclical
INRO
XLSR
Financial Services
INRO
XLSR
Industrials
INRO
XLSR
Communication Services
INRO
XLSR
Healthcare
INRO
XLSR
Consumer Defensive
INRO
XLSR
Energy
INRO
XLSR
Basic Materials
INRO
XLSR
-
Utilities
INRO
XLSR
-
Real Estate
INRO
XLSR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRO vs. XLSR — Risk / Return Rank
INRO
XLSR
INRO vs. XLSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INRO | XLSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.11 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.50 | 9.15 | +6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INRO vs. XLSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum XLSR drawdown of -32.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and XLSR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRO | XLSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.02% | -32.94% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -11.06% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -2.46% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -5.31% | +2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.55% | -0.48% |
Volatility
INRO vs. XLSR - Volatility Comparison
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) at 5.13%. This indicates that INRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRO | XLSR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 5.13% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | 10.26% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 13.06% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 17.19% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 20.05% | -2.79% |
INRO vs. XLSR - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than XLSR's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRO vs. XLSR - Dividend Comparison
INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than XLSR's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRO Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLSR SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.66% | 1.04% | 1.80% | 3.44% | 1.25% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, INRO and XLSR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
INRO has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to XLSR (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INRO dropped -20.02% vs XLSR's -32.94%.
On 1-year performance, INRO leads with 31.94% vs 23.28% for XLSR. On fees, INRO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, XLSR has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INRO has performed better with a 31.94% return vs 23.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INRO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XLSR.
INRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.53% for XLSR.
INRO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLSR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for INRO and 0.70% for XLSR.
INRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INRO and XLSR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer