PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INRO vs. XLSR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INRO vs. XLSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLSR's 4.36% return.


INRO

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.10%
YTD
13.70%
6M
13.07%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLSR

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
4.36%
6M
4.27%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INRO vs. XLSR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
INRO
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF
13.70%16.67%10.92%
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
4.36%17.34%7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between INRO and XLSR is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024

0.96

The correlation between INRO and XLSR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

INRO vs. XLSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INRO
XLSR

Technology

41.7%
39.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
3.6%

Financial Services

9.6%
0.7%

Industrials

8.7%
17.9%

Communication Services

8.0%
19.5%

Healthcare

8.0%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
9.6%

Energy

2.6%
6.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.3%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Technology

INRO
41.7%
XLSR
39.6%

Consumer Cyclical

INRO
11.1%
XLSR
3.6%

Financial Services

INRO
9.6%
XLSR
0.7%

Industrials

INRO
8.7%
XLSR
17.9%

Communication Services

INRO
8.0%
XLSR
19.5%

Healthcare

INRO
8.0%
XLSR
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

INRO
6.5%
XLSR
9.6%

Energy

INRO
2.6%
XLSR
6.0%

Basic Materials

INRO
1.9%
XLSR

-

Utilities

INRO
1.3%
XLSR

-

Real Estate

INRO
0.4%
XLSR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INRO vs. XLSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INRO
INRO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
INRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
INRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XLSR
XLSR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XLSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLSR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XLSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLSR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INRO vs. XLSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INROXLSRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.11

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.50

9.15

+6.35

INRO vs. XLSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the XLSR Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INRO and XLSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INRO vs. XLSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum XLSR drawdown of -32.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and XLSR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INROXLSRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-32.94%

+12.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-11.06%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-2.46%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-5.31%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.55%

-0.48%

Volatility

INRO vs. XLSR - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF (XLSR) at 5.13%. This indicates that INRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INROXLSRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

5.13%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

10.26%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

13.06%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

17.19%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

20.05%

-2.79%

INRO vs. XLSR - Expense Ratio Comparison

INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than XLSR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

INRO vs. XLSR - Dividend Comparison

INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than XLSR's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
INRO
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF
0.60%0.68%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLSR
SPDR SSGA US Sector Rotation ETF
0.53%0.58%0.66%1.04%1.80%3.44%1.25%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, INRO and XLSR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

INRO has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to XLSR (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INRO dropped -20.02% vs XLSR's -32.94%.

On 1-year performance, INRO leads with 31.94% vs 23.28% for XLSR. On fees, INRO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, XLSR has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INRO has performed better with a 31.94% return vs 23.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INRO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for XLSR.

INRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.53% for XLSR.

INRO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLSR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for INRO and 0.70% for XLSR.

INRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INRO and XLSR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer